Deploy WSDL file as OSGI Bundle in Apache Karaf

byDominik Przybysz
August 16, 2016
3 minute read

Introduction

WSDL file describes webservices. Java classes are often generated from WSDL. For this purpose, we could use command line tools (e. g. wsdl2Java or wsimport) or using maven plugin.

From the other side, we have Apache Karaf which is OSGI container. Karaf has installed by default many deployers for creating OSGi bundles from files, e. g. Blueprint deployer, Spring deployer or War deployer.

It is easy to generate java classes from WSDL file and also to create custom deployer for Karaf, so why do not join these two features?

Installation of WSDL deployer

Source code of my WSDL deployer is provided here. You can download and build it:

mvn clean install

We also need Karaf. I will use the newest version 4.0.5. It could be download from Karaf website. When you download and unpack it, you can run it:

$ cd PUT_PATH_TO_KARAF_DIR_HERE
$ ./bin/karaf
    __ __                  ____      
   / //_/____ __________ _/ __/      
  / ,<  / __ / ___/ __ / /_        
 / /| |/ /_/ / /  / /_/ / __/        
/_/ |_|\__,_/_/   \__,_/_/         

Apache Karaf (4.0.5)

Hit '<tab>' for a list of available commands
and '[cmd] --help' for help on a specific command.
Hit '<ctrl-d>' or type 'system:shutdown' or 'logout' to shutdown Karaf.

karaf@root()>

and install commons-io and wsdl-delpoyer bundles:

karaf@root()> install -s mvn:org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.commons-io/1.4_3
Bundle ID: 52
karaf@root()> install -s mvn:com.github.alien11689.karaf/wsdl-deployer/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Bundle ID: 53

Install WSDL from Karaf shell

I will test deployer using WSDL file named exampleService-2.0.0.wsdl (provided WSDL is similar to this, but has another namespace in types schama for testing purpose):

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<wsdl:definitions
    xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
    xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd"
    xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
    xmlns:tns="http://Example.org"
    xmlns:sns="http://Example.org/schema"
    xmlns:wsa="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing"
    xmlns:wsp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy"
    xmlns:wsap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing/policy"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    xmlns:msc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/2005/12/wsdl/contract"
    xmlns:wsaw="http://www.w3.org/2006/05/addressing/wsdl"
    xmlns:soap12="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/"
    xmlns:wsa10="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
    xmlns:wsx="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/mex"
  targetNamespace="http://Example.org"
    xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/">
    <wsdl:types>
        <xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://Example.org/schema" elementFormDefault="qualified" >
            <xsd:element name="Add">
                <xsd:complexType>
                    <xsd:sequence>
                        <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="a" type="xsd:int" />
                        <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="b" type="xsd:int" />
                    </xsd:sequence>
                </xsd:complexType>
            </xsd:element>
            <xsd:element name="AddResponse">
                <xsd:complexType>
                    <xsd:sequence>
                        <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="result" type="xsd:int" />
                    </xsd:sequence>
                </xsd:complexType>
            </xsd:element>
            <xsd:element name="Subtract">
                <xsd:complexType>
                    <xsd:sequence>
                        <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="a" type="xsd:int" />
                        <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="b" type="xsd:int" />
                    </xsd:sequence>
                </xsd:complexType>
            </xsd:element>
            <xsd:element name="SubtractResponse">
                <xsd:complexType>
                    <xsd:sequence>
                        <xsd:element minOccurs="0" name="result" type="xsd:int" />
                    </xsd:sequence>
                </xsd:complexType>
            </xsd:element>
        </xsd:schema>
    </wsdl:types>
    <wsdl:message name="ICalculator_Add_InputMessage">
        <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="sns:Add" />
    </wsdl:message>
    <wsdl:message name="ICalculator_Add_OutputMessage">
        <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="sns:AddResponse" />
    </wsdl:message>
    <wsdl:message name="ICalculator_Subtract_InputMessage">
        <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="sns:Subtract" />
    </wsdl:message>
    <wsdl:message name="ICalculator_Subtract_OutputMessage">
        <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="sns:SubtractResponse" />
    </wsdl:message>
    <wsdl:portType name="ICalculator">
        <wsdl:operation name="Add">
            <wsdl:input wsaw:Action="http://Example.org/ICalculator/Add" message="tns:ICalculator_Add_InputMessage" />
            <wsdl:output wsaw:Action="http://Example.org/ICalculator/AddResponse" message="tns:ICalculator_Add_OutputMessage" />
        </wsdl:operation>
        <wsdl:operation name="Subtract">
            <wsdl:input wsaw:Action="http://Example.org/ICalculator/Subtract" message="tns:ICalculator_Subtract_InputMessage" />
            <wsdl:output wsaw:Action="http://Example.org/ICalculator/SubtractResponse" message="tns:ICalculator_Subtract_OutputMessage" />
        </wsdl:operation>
    </wsdl:portType>
    <wsdl:binding name="DefaultBinding_ICalculator" type="tns:ICalculator">
        <soap:binding transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" />
        <wsdl:operation name="Add">
            <soap:operation soapAction="http://Example.org/ICalculator/Add" style="document" />
            <wsdl:input>
                <soap:body use="literal" />
            </wsdl:input>
            <wsdl:output>
                <soap:body use="literal" />
            </wsdl:output>
        </wsdl:operation>
        <wsdl:operation name="Subtract">
            <soap:operation soapAction="http://Example.org/ICalculator/Subtract" style="document" />
            <wsdl:input>
                <soap:body use="literal" />
            </wsdl:input>
            <wsdl:output>
                <soap:body use="literal" />
            </wsdl:output>
        </wsdl:operation>
    </wsdl:binding>
    <wsdl:service name="CalculatorService">
        <wsdl:port name="ICalculator" binding="tns:DefaultBinding_ICalculator">
            <soap:address location="http://localhost/ICalculator" />
        </wsdl:port>
    </wsdl:service>
</wsdl:definitions>

We could install it via command:

karaf@root()> install -s wsdl:file:PUT_PATH_TO_WSDL_HERE/exampleService-2.0.0.wsdl\$package=org.github.alien11689.example&s1=http://Example.org/schema&t1=org.github.alien11689.example.schema
Bundle ID: 54

File must have format ${bundleSymbolicName}-${version}.wsdl.

Provided options are:

package – allows to change package of generated interface
pair s1 and t1 – maps schema in WSDL to package (WSDL deployer is in draft verion nowadays provides options to map only one schema).

Karaf has installed this file:

karaf@root()> headers 54

Bundle 54
---------
Manifest-Version = 2

Bundle-ManifestVersion = 2
Bundle-SymbolicName = exampleService-2.0.0.wsdl
Bundle-Version = 2.0.0

Export-Package =
    org.github.alien11689.example.schema;version=2.0.0,
    org.github.alien11689.example;version=2.0.0
Import-Package =
    javax.jws,
    javax.jws.soap,
    javax.xml.bind.annotation,
    javax.xml.namespace,
    javax.xml.ws

Install WSDL by putting it into Karaf drop folder

You can also install WSDL file by copying it to deploy directory:

cp PUT_PATH_TO_WSDL_HERE/exampleService-2.0.0.wsdl PUT_PATH_TO_KARAF_DIR_HERE/deploy/deployedExampleService-2.0.0.wsdl

It is much more simple to do, but do not allow for customization (e. g. namespace to package mapping). It creates bundle:

karaf@root()> list | grep deployedExampleService
55 | Active |  80 | 2.0.0          | deployedExampleService-2.0.0.wsdl
karaf@root()> headers 55

Bundle 55
---------
Manifest-Version = 2

Bundle-ManifestVersion = 2
Bundle-SymbolicName = deployedExampleService-2.0.0.wsdl
Bundle-Version = 2.0.0

Export-Package =
    org.example;version=2.0.0,
    org.example.schema;version=2.0.0
Import-Package =
    javax.jws,
    javax.jws.soap,
    javax.xml.bind.annotation,
    javax.xml.namespace,
    javax.xml.ws

How does it work?

Deployer uses wsimport command to create in temporary directory and compile generated java classes. Compiled class are packed with MANIFEST.MF into service.jar and such jar is really installed in OSGi container. For example, my temporary directory is /tmp/4ff81631-3c08-487a-b731-1f95c568026f:

$ tree /tmp/4ff81631-3c08-487a-b731-1f95c568026f
/tmp/4ff81631-3c08-487a-b731-1f95c568026f
├── Jaxb-binding.xml
├── Jaxws-binding.xml
├── service.wsdl
├── src
│   └── org
│       └── github
│           └── alien11689
│               └── example
│                   ├── CalculatorService.java
│                   ├── ICalculator.java
│                   └── schema
│                       ├── Add.java
│                       ├── AddResponse.java
│                       ├── ObjectFactory.java
│                       ├── package-info.java
│                       ├── Subtract.java
│                       └── SubtractResponse.java
└── target
    ├── org
    │   └── github
    │       └── alien11689
    │           └── example
    │               ├── CalculatorService.class
    │               ├── ICalculator.class
    │               └── schema
    │                   ├── Add.class
    │                   ├── AddResponse.class
    │                   ├── ObjectFactory.class
    │                   ├── package-info.class
    │                   ├── Subtract.class
    │                   └── SubtractResponse.class
    └── service.jar

And my service.jar contains:

$ jar tf /tmp/4ff81631-3c08-487a-b731-1f95c568026f/target/service.jar
META-INF/
META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
org/
org/github/
org/github/alien11689/
org/github/alien11689/example/
org/github/alien11689/example/schema/
org/github/alien11689/example/schema/Add.class
org/github/alien11689/example/schema/ObjectFactory.class
org/github/alien11689/example/schema/Subtract.class
org/github/alien11689/example/schema/SubtractResponse.class
org/github/alien11689/example/schema/package-info.class
org/github/alien11689/example/schema/AddResponse.class
org/github/alien11689/example/ICalculator.class
org/github/alien11689/example/CalculatorService.class

Conclusion

WSDL generation and Karaf deployers could be easily joined and simplified creation of OSGi bundles without explicite creation of jar. Provided WSDL deployer is just draft, but could be very useful when we have many WSDLs and do not want to create separate artifacts for them.

Source code of WSDL deployer is provided here.

Dominik Przybysz

— Previous article

Sputnik lands on GitHub!

Next article —

For sure following hype just for being “hot” can bring problems.

JAXB and unmappable character for encoding UTF-8

byMichał Trzaskowski
July 8, 2011

Using locale specific characters in schema or wsdl (i.e. for documentation purpose) is still quite problematic. Especially if…

DDevelopment & Design

Migracja strony kodowej

byJan Matusiewicz
February 23, 2009

Ostatnio wystąpił problem z pewną bazą deweloperską, w której nie działały polskie znaki. Sprawdziłem parametry bazy poprzez zapytanie…

DDevelopment & Design

Integration testing custom validation constraints in Jersey 2

byPiotr Jagielski
October 26, 2013

I recently joined a team trying to switch a monolithic legacy system into set of RESTful services in Java. They decided to use latest 2.x version of Jersey as a REST container which was not a first choice for me, since I’m not a big fan of JSR-* specs. But now I must admit that JAX-RS 2.x is doing things right: requires almost zero boilerplate code, support auto-discovery of features and prefers convention over configuration like other modern frameworks. Since the spec is still young, it’s hard to find good tutorials and kick-off projects with some working code. I created jersey2-starter project on GitHub which can be used as starting point for your own production-ready RESTful service. In this post I’d like to cover how to implement and integration test your own validation constraints of REST resources.

Custom constraints

One of the issues which bothers me when coding REST in Java is littering your class model with annotations. Suppose you want to build a simple Todo list REST service, when using Jackson, validation and Spring Data, you can easily end up with this as your entity class:

@Document
public class Todo {
    private Long id;
    @NotNull
    private String description;
    @NotNull
    private Boolean completed;
    @NotNull
    private DateTime dueDate;

    @JsonCreator
    public Todo(@JsonProperty("description") String description, @JsonProperty("dueDate") DateTime dueDate) {
        this.description = description;
        this.dueDate = dueDate;
        this.completed = false;
    }
    // getters and setters
}

Your domain model is now effectively blured by messy annotations almost everywhere. Let’s see what we can do with validation constraints (@NotNulls). Some may say that you could introduce some DTO layer with own validation rules, but it conflicts for me with pure REST API design, which stands that you operate on resources which should map to your domain classes. On the other hand - what does it mean that Todo object is valid? When you create a Todo you should provide a description and due date, but what when you’re updating? You should be able to change any of description, due date (postponing) and completion flag (marking as done) - but you should provide at least one of these as valid modification. So my idea is to introduce custom validation constraints, different ones for creation and modification:

@Target({TYPE, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = ValidForCreation.Validator.class)
public @interface ValidForCreation {
    //...
    class Validator implements ConstraintValidator<ValidForCreation, Todo> {
    /...
        @Override
        public boolean isValid(Todo todo, ConstraintValidatorContext constraintValidatorContext) {
            return todo != null
                && todo.getId() == null
                && todo.getDescription() != null
                && todo.getDueDate() != null;
        }
    }
}

@Target({TYPE, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = ValidForModification.Validator.class)
public @interface ValidForModification {
    //...
    class Validator implements ConstraintValidator<ValidForModification, Todo> {
    /...
        @Override
        public boolean isValid(Todo todo, ConstraintValidatorContext constraintValidatorContext) {
            return todo != null
                && todo.getId() == null
                && (todo.getDescription() != null || todo.getDueDate() != null || todo.isCompleted() != null);
        }
    }
}

And now you can move validation annotations to the definition of a REST endpoint:

@POST
@Consumes(APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response create(@ValidForCreation Todo todo) {...}

@PUT
@Consumes(APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response update(@ValidForModification Todo todo) {...}

And now you can remove those NotNulls from your model.

Integration testing

There are in general two approaches to integration testing:

test is being run on separate JVM than the app, which is deployed on some other integration environment
test deploys the application programmatically in the setup block.

Both of these have their pros and cons, but for small enough servoces, I personally prefer the second approach. It’s much easier to setup and you have only one JVM started, which makes debugging really easy. You can use a generic framework like Arquillian for starting your application in a container environment, but I prefer simple solutions and just use emdedded Jetty. To make test setup 100% production equivalent, I’m creating full Jetty’s WebAppContext and have to resolve all runtime dependencies for Jersey auto-discovery to work. This can be simply achieved with Maven resolved from Shrinkwrap - an Arquillian subproject:

    WebAppContext webAppContext = new WebAppContext();
    webAppContext.setResourceBase("src/main/webapp");
    webAppContext.setContextPath("/");
    File[] mavenLibs = Maven.resolver().loadPomFromFile("pom.xml")
                .importCompileAndRuntimeDependencies()
                .resolve().withTransitivity().asFile();
    for (File file: mavenLibs) {
        webAppContext.getMetaData().addWebInfJar(new FileResource(file.toURI()));
    }
    webAppContext.getMetaData().addContainerResource(new FileResource(new File("./target/classes").toURI()));

    webAppContext.setConfigurations(new Configuration[] {
        new AnnotationConfiguration(),
        new WebXmlConfiguration(),
        new WebInfConfiguration()
    });
    server.setHandler(webAppContext);

(this Stackoverflow thread inspired me a lot here)

Now it’s time for the last part of the post: parametrizing our integration tests. Since we want to test validation constraints, there are many edge paths to check (and make your code coverage close to 100%). Writing one test per each case could be a bad idea. Among the many solutions for JUnit I’m most convinced to the Junit Params by Pragmatists team. It’s really simple and have nice concept of JQuery-like helper for creating providers. Here is my tests code (I’m also using builder pattern here to create various kinds of Todos):

@Test
@Parameters(method = "provideInvalidTodosForCreation")
public void shouldRejectInvalidTodoWhenCreate(Todo todo) {
    Response response = createTarget().request().post(Entity.json(todo));

    assertThat(response.getStatus()).isEqualTo(BAD_REQUEST.getStatusCode());
}

private static Object[] provideInvalidTodosForCreation() {
    return $(
        new TodoBuilder().withDescription("test").build(),
        new TodoBuilder().withDueDate(DateTime.now()).build(),
        new TodoBuilder().withId(123L).build(),
        new TodoBuilder().build()
    );
}

OK, enough of reading, feel free to clone the project and start writing your REST services!

Custom constraints

@Document
public class Todo {
    private Long id;
    @NotNull
    private String description;
    @NotNull
    private Boolean completed;
    @NotNull
    private DateTime dueDate;

    @JsonCreator
    public Todo(@JsonProperty("description") String description, @JsonProperty("dueDate") DateTime dueDate) {
        this.description = description;
        this.dueDate = dueDate;
        this.completed = false;
    }
    // getters and setters
}

@Target({TYPE, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = ValidForCreation.Validator.class)
public @interface ValidForCreation {
    //...
    class Validator implements ConstraintValidator<ValidForCreation, Todo> {
    /...
        @Override
        public boolean isValid(Todo todo, ConstraintValidatorContext constraintValidatorContext) {
            return todo != null
                && todo.getId() == null
                && todo.getDescription() != null
                && todo.getDueDate() != null;
        }
    }
}

@Target({TYPE, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = ValidForModification.Validator.class)
public @interface ValidForModification {
    //...
    class Validator implements ConstraintValidator<ValidForModification, Todo> {
    /...
        @Override
        public boolean isValid(Todo todo, ConstraintValidatorContext constraintValidatorContext) {
            return todo != null
                && todo.getId() == null
                && (todo.getDescription() != null || todo.getDueDate() != null || todo.isCompleted() != null);
        }
    }
}

And now you can move validation annotations to the definition of a REST endpoint:

@POST
@Consumes(APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response create(@ValidForCreation Todo todo) {...}

@PUT
@Consumes(APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response update(@ValidForModification Todo todo) {...}

And now you can remove those NotNulls from your model.

Integration testing

There are in general two approaches to integration testing:

test is being run on separate JVM than the app, which is deployed on some other integration environment
test deploys the application programmatically in the setup block.

    WebAppContext webAppContext = new WebAppContext();
    webAppContext.setResourceBase("src/main/webapp");
    webAppContext.setContextPath("/");
    File[] mavenLibs = Maven.resolver().loadPomFromFile("pom.xml")
                .importCompileAndRuntimeDependencies()
                .resolve().withTransitivity().asFile();
    for (File file: mavenLibs) {
        webAppContext.getMetaData().addWebInfJar(new FileResource(file.toURI()));
    }
    webAppContext.getMetaData().addContainerResource(new FileResource(new File("./target/classes").toURI()));

    webAppContext.setConfigurations(new Configuration[] {
        new AnnotationConfiguration(),
        new WebXmlConfiguration(),
        new WebInfConfiguration()
    });
    server.setHandler(webAppContext);

(this Stackoverflow thread inspired me a lot here)

@Test
@Parameters(method = "provideInvalidTodosForCreation")
public void shouldRejectInvalidTodoWhenCreate(Todo todo) {
    Response response = createTarget().request().post(Entity.json(todo));

    assertThat(response.getStatus()).isEqualTo(BAD_REQUEST.getStatusCode());
}

private static Object[] provideInvalidTodosForCreation() {
    return $(
        new TodoBuilder().withDescription("test").build(),
        new TodoBuilder().withDueDate(DateTime.now()).build(),
        new TodoBuilder().withId(123L).build(),
        new TodoBuilder().build()
    );
}

OK, enough of reading, feel free to clone the project and start writing your REST services!

Deploy WSDL file as OSGI Bundle in Apache Karaf

Introduction

Installation of WSDL deployer

Install WSDL from Karaf shell

Install WSDL by putting it into Karaf drop folder

How does it work?

Conclusion

Tags:

Dominik Przybysz

Sputnik lands on GitHub!

For sure following hype just for being “hot” can bring problems.

You May Also Like

Custom constraints

Integration testing

Custom constraints

Integration testing