DDevelopment & Design

The Future of Programming

A very interesting presentation: http://vimeo.com/71278954 by Bret Victor presented at Dropbox’s DBX conference on July 9, 2013.

My first feeling after I’ve seen it was really sad. Did we, programmers, really lost last 40 years ?

My second thought was slightly more optimistic. Maybe we didn’t lost those years at all ? Maybe we used it to learn limitation of “conservative” apprach. Maybe we used it to develop techniques and technologies to make all those “forgoten” principles economically cost effective ?

And most important conclusion – Never think that you really “know what you are doing” and never stop looking for other solutions.

— Previous article

Spock, Java and Maven

Next article —

Unable to instantiate default tuplizer

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

[:en] Operational problems with Zookeeper

This post is a summary of what has been presented by Kathleen Ting on StrangeLoop conference. You can watch the original here: http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Misconfiguration-ZooKeeper I've decided to put this selection here for quick reference. ...This post is a summary of what has been presented by Kathleen Ting on StrangeLoop conference. You can watch the original here: http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Misconfiguration-ZooKeeper I've decided to put this selection here for quick reference. ...
DDevelopment & Design

Distributed scans with HBase

HBase is by design a columnar store, that is optimized for random reads. You just ask for a row using rowId as an identifier and you get your data instantaneously. Performing a scan on part or whole table is a completely different thing. First of all, it is sequential. Meaning it is rather slow, because it doesn't use all the RegionServers at the same time. It is implemented that way to realize the contract of Scan command - which has to return results sorted by key. So, how to do this efficiently?HBase is by design a columnar store, that is optimized for random reads. You just ask for a row using rowId as an identifier and you get your data instantaneously. Performing a scan on part or whole table is a completely different thing. First of all, it is sequential. Meaning it is rather slow, because it doesn't use all the RegionServers at the same time. It is implemented that way to realize the contract of Scan command - which has to return results sorted by key. So, how to do this efficiently?