Spock, Java and Maven

Few months ago I’ve came across Groovy – powerful language for JVM platform which combines the power of Java with abilities typical for scripting languages (dynamic typing, metaprogramming). Together with Groovy I’ve discovered spock framework (https://code.google.com/p/spock/) – specification framework for Groovy (of course you can test Java classes too!). But spock is not only test/specification framework – it also contains powerful mocking tools. Even though spock is dedicated for Groovy there is no problem with using it for Java classes tests. In this post I’m going to describe how to configure Maven project to build and run spock specifications together with traditional JUnit tests. Firstly, we need to prepare pom.xml and add necessary dependencies and plugins. Two obligatory libraries are: <dependency> <groupid>org.spockframework</groupId> <artifactid>spock-core</artifactId> <version>0.7-groovy-2.0</version> <scope>test</scope></dependency><dependency> <groupid>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId> <artifactid>groovy-all</artifactId> <version>${groovy.version}</version> <scope>test</scope></dependency> Where groovy.version is property defined in pom.xml for more convenient use and easy version change, just like this: <properties> <gmaven-plugin.version>1.4</gmaven-plugin.version> <groovy.version>2.1.5</groovy.version></properties> I’ve added property for gmaven-plugin version for the same reason ;) Besides these two dependencies, we can use few additional ones providing extra functionality: cglib – for class mocking objenesis – enables mocking classes without default constructor To add them to the project put these lines in <dependencies> section of pom.xml: <dependency> <groupid>cglib</groupId> <artifactid>cglib-nodep</artifactId> <version>3.0</version> <scope>test</scope></dependency><dependency> <groupid>org.objenesis</groupId> <artifactid>objenesis</artifactId> <version>1.3</version> <scope>test</scope></dependency> And that’s all for dependencies section. Now we will focus on plugins necessary to compile Groovy classes. We need to add gmaven-plugin with gmaven-runtime-2.0 dependency in plugins section: <plugin> <groupid>org.codehaus.gmaven</groupId> <artifactid>gmaven-plugin</artifactId> <version>${gmaven-plugin.version}</version> <configuration> <providerselection>2.0</providerSelection> </configuration> <executions> <execution> <goals> <goal>compile</goal> <goal>testCompile</goal> </goals> </execution> </executions> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupid>org.codehaus.gmaven.runtime</groupId> <artifactid>gmaven-runtime-2.0</artifactId> <version>${gmaven-plugin.version}</version> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupid>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId> <artifactid>groovy-all</artifactId> </exclusion> </exclusions> </dependency> <dependency> <groupid>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId> <artifactid>groovy-all</artifactId> <version>${groovy.version}</version> </dependency> </dependencies></plugin> With these configuration we can use spock and write our first specifications. But there is one issue: default settings for maven-surefire plugin demand that test classes must end with “..Test” postfix, which is ok when we want to use such naming scheme for our spock tests. But if we want to name them like CommentSpec.groovy or whatever with “..Spec” ending (what in my opinion is much more readable) we need to make little change in surefire plugin configuration: <plugin> <groupid>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactid>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.15</version> <configuration> <includes> <include>**/*Test.java</include> <include>**/*Spec.java</include> </includes> </configuration></plugin> As you can see there is a little trick ;) We add include directive for standard Java JUnit test ending with “..Test” postfix, but there is also an entry for spock test ending with “..Spec”. And there is a trick: we must write “**/*Spec.java”, not “**/*Spec.groovy”, otherwise Maven will not run spock tests (which is strange and I’ve spent some time to figure out why Maven can’t run my specs).Little update: instead of “*.java” postfix for both types of tests we can write “*.class” what is in my opinion more readable and clean: <include>**/*Test.class</include><include>**/*Spec.class</include> (thanks to Tomek Pęksa for pointing this out!) With such configuration, we can write either traditional JUnit test and put them in src/test/java directory or groovy spock specifications and place them in src/test/groovy. And both will work together just fine :) In one of my next posts I’ll write something about using spock and its mocking abilities in practice, so stay in tune.
Few months ago I’ve came across Groovy – powerful language for JVM platform which combines the power of Java with abilities typical for scripting languages (dynamic typing, metaprogramming).
Together with Groovy I’ve discovered spock framework (https://code.google.com/p/spock/) – specification framework for Groovy (of course you can test Java classes too!). But spock is not only test/specification framework – it also contains powerful mocking tools.
Even though spock is dedicated for Groovy there is no problem with using it for Java classes tests. In this post I’m going to describe how to configure Maven project to build and run spock specifications together with traditional JUnit tests.
Firstly, we need to prepare pom.xml and add necessary dependencies and plugins.
Two obligatory libraries are:
<dependency>
    <groupid>org.spockframework</groupId>
    <artifactid>spock-core</artifactId>
    <version>0.7-groovy-2.0</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
    <groupid>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId>
    <artifactid>groovy-all</artifactId>
    <version>${groovy.version}</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>

Where groovy.version is property defined in pom.xml for more convenient use and easy version change, just like this:

<properties>
    <gmaven-plugin.version>1.4</gmaven-plugin.version>
    <groovy.version>2.1.5</groovy.version>
</properties>

 

I’ve added property for gmaven-plugin version for the same reason ;)
Besides these two dependencies, we can use few additional ones providing extra functionality:

 

  • cglib – for class mocking
  • objenesis – enables mocking classes without default constructor

 

To add them to the project put these lines in section of pom.xml:
<dependency>
    <groupid>cglib</groupId>
    <artifactid>cglib-nodep</artifactId>
    <version>3.0</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
    <groupid>org.objenesis</groupId>
    <artifactid>objenesis</artifactId>
    <version>1.3</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
And that’s all for dependencies section. Now we will focus on plugins necessary to compile Groovy classes. We need to add gmaven-plugin with gmaven-runtime-2.0 dependency in plugins section:
<plugin>
    <groupid>org.codehaus.gmaven</groupId>
    <artifactid>gmaven-plugin</artifactId>
    <version>${gmaven-plugin.version}</version>
    <configuration>
        <providerselection>2.0</providerSelection>
    </configuration>
    <executions>
        <execution>
            <goals>
                <goal>compile</goal>
                <goal>testCompile</goal>
            </goals>
        </execution>
    </executions>
    <dependencies>
        <dependency>
            <groupid>org.codehaus.gmaven.runtime</groupId>
            <artifactid>gmaven-runtime-2.0</artifactId>
            <version>${gmaven-plugin.version}</version>
            <exclusions>
                <exclusion>
                    <groupid>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId>
                    <artifactid>groovy-all</artifactId>
                </exclusion>
            </exclusions>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupid>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId>
            <artifactid>groovy-all</artifactId>
            <version>${groovy.version}</version>
        </dependency>
    </dependencies>
</plugin>
With these configuration we can use spock and write our first specifications. But there is one issue: default settings for maven-surefire plugin demand that test classes must end with “..Test” postfix, which is ok when we want to use such naming scheme for our spock tests. But if we want to name them like CommentSpec.groovy or whatever with “..Spec” ending (what in my opinion is much more readable) we need to make little change in surefire plugin configuration:
<plugin>
    <groupid>org.apache.maven.plugins
    </groupId>
    <artifactid>maven-surefire-plugin
    </artifactId>
    <version>2.15</version>
    <configuration>
        <includes>
            <include>**/*Test.java</include>
            <include>**/*Spec.java</include>
        </includes>
    </configuration>
</plugin>
As you can see there is a little trick ;) We add include directive for standard Java JUnit test ending with “..Test” postfix, but there is also an entry for spock test ending with “..Spec”. And there is a trick: we must write “**/*Spec.java”, not “**/*Spec.groovy”, otherwise Maven will not run spock tests (which is strange and I’ve spent some time to figure out why Maven can’t run my specs). Little update: instead of “*.java” postfix for both types of tests we can write “*.class” what is in my opinion more readable and clean:
<include>**/*Test.class</include>
<include>**/*Spec.class</include>

(thanks to Tomek Pęksa for pointing this out!)

With such configuration, we can write either traditional JUnit test and put them in src/test/java directory or groovy spock specifications and place them in src/test/groovy. And both will work together just fine :) In one of my next posts I’ll write something about using spock and its mocking abilities in practice, so stay in tune.
You May Also Like

Sygnalizacyjne ABC

Poniższy artykuł oparty jest na wspaniałej pozycji książkowej “System Sygnalizacji nr 7 G. Danielewicz, W.Kabaciński”. Gorąco zachęcam do…

Need to make a quick json fixes – JSONPath for rescue

From time to time I have a need to do some fixes in my json data. In a world of flat files I do this with grep/sed/awk tool chain. How to handle it for JSON? Searching for a solution I came across the JSONPath. It quite mature tool (from 2007) but I haven't hear about it so I decided to share my experience with others.

First of all you can try it without pain online: http://jsonpath.curiousconcept.com/. Full syntax is described at http://goessner.net/articles/JsonPath/



But also you can download python binding and run it from command line:
$ sudo apt-get install python-jsonpath-rw
$ sudo apt-get install python-setuptools
$ sudo easy_install -U jsonpath

After that you can use inside python or with simple cli wrapper:
#!/usr/bin/python
import sys, json, jsonpath

path = sys.argv[
1]

result = jsonpath.jsonpath(json.load(sys.stdin), path)
print json.dumps(result, indent=2)

… you can use it in your shell e.g. for json:
{
"store": {
"book": [
{
"category": "reference",
"author": "Nigel Rees",
"title": "Sayings of the Century",
"price": 8.95
},
{
"category": "fiction",
"author": "Evelyn Waugh",
"title": "Sword of Honour",
"price": 12.99
},
{
"category": "fiction",
"author": "Herman Melville",
"title": "Moby Dick",
"isbn": "0-553-21311-3",
"price": 8.99
},
{
"category": "fiction",
"author": "J. R. R. Tolkien",
"title": "The Lord of the Rings",
"isbn": "0-395-19395-8",
"price": 22.99
}
],
"bicycle": {
"color": "red",
"price": 19.95
}
}
}

You can print only book nodes with price lower than 10 by:
$ jsonpath '$..book[?(@.price 

Result:
[
{
"category": "reference",
"price": 8.95,
"title": "Sayings of the Century",
"author": "Nigel Rees"
},
{
"category": "fiction",
"price": 8.99,
"title": "Moby Dick",
"isbn": "0-553-21311-3",
"author": "Herman Melville"
}
]

Have a nice JSON hacking!From time to time I have a need to do some fixes in my json data. In a world of flat files I do this with grep/sed/awk tool chain. How to handle it for JSON? Searching for a solution I came across the JSONPath. It quite mature tool (from 2007) but I haven't hear about it so I decided to share my experience with others.