Deep dive into Spring Boot Actuator HTTP metrics

Actuator Metrics

As reported in Michał Bobowski post, we heavily use Spring Boot Actuator metrics system based on Micrometer. It provides a set of practical metrics regarding JVM stats like CPU or memory utilization. Our applications have to meet the most sophisticated needs of our clients thus we try to take advantage of http.server.request endpoint.

Introduction

By default, Spring Boot Actuator gathers endpoint statistics for all classes annotated with @RestController. It registers a WebMvcMetricsFilter bean, which is responsible for timing a request. A special TimingContext attribute is attached to the request so that Spring Boot knows when the request started.

Actuator metrics model

When you call http://localhost:8080/actuator/metrics/http.server.request endpoint you will get something similar to this:

{
  "name": "http.server.requests",
  "description": null,
  "baseUnit": "milliseconds",
  "measurements": [
    {
      "statistic": "COUNT",
      "value": 12
    },
    {
      "statistic": "TOTAL_TIME",
      "value": 21487.256644
    },
    {
      "statistic": "MAX",
      "value": 2731.787888
    }
  ],
  "availableTags": [
    {
      "tag": "exception",
      "values": [
        "None",
        "RuntimeException"
      ]
    },
    {
      "tag": "method",
      "values": [
        "GET"
      ]
    },
    {
      "tag": "uri",
      "values": [
        "/example/success"
      ]
    },
    {
      "tag": "outcome",
      "values": [
        "SERVER_ERROR",
        "SUCCESS"
      ]
    },
    {
      "tag": "status",
      "values": [
        "500",
        "200"
      ]
    }
  ]
}

You will surely see the measurements section. It provides types and values of statistics recorded at a certain point in time. Types of statistics are ones described in Statistics enum.
Another one is the availableTags section, which contains a set of default tags distinguishing each metric by URI, status, or method. You can easily put your tags there like a host or container. If you want to check metric for a particular tag, Actuator lets you do this by using tag query http://localhost:8080/actuator/metrics/http.server.request?tag=status:200

Metric system model

However, each monitoring system has its own metrics model and therefore uses different names for the same things. In our case, we use Influx Registry.
Let’s look into InfluxMeterRegistry class implementation.

private Stream writeTimer(Timer timer) {
    final Stream fields = Stream.of(
        new Field("sum", timer.totalTime(getBaseTimeUnit())),
        new Field("count", timer.count()),
        new Field("mean", timer.mean(getBaseTimeUnit())),
        new Field("upper", timer.max(getBaseTimeUnit()))
    );

    return Stream.of(influxLineProtocol(timer.getId(), "histogram", fields));
}

We see which field in influx corresponds to actuators measurement. Moreover, our registry equips us with an additional mean field, which is basically TOTAL_TIME divided by COUNT. Therefore we don’t need to calculate it manually inside our monitoring system.

Summary

(1) Be aware that the Actuator metric model directly corresponds to Micrometer model
(2) When it comes to timing requests carefully choose the step in which metrics are exported
(3) Do not mix composing metric values with aggregations, selectors, and transformations, e.g. mean(mean)

You May Also Like

How to use mocks in controller tests

Even since I started to write tests for my Grails application I couldn't find many articles on using mocks. Everyone is talking about tests and TDD but if you search for it there isn't many articles.

Today I want to share with you a test with mocks for a simple and complete scenario. I have a simple application that can fetch Twitter tweets and present it to user. I use REST service and I use GET to fetch tweets by id like this: http://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/show/236024636775735296.json. You can copy and paste it into your browser to see a result.

My application uses Grails 2.1 with spock-0.6 for tests. I have TwitterReaderService that fetches tweets by id, then I parse a response into my Tweet class.


class TwitterReaderService {
Tweet readTweet(String id) throws TwitterError {
try {
String jsonBody = callTwitter(id)
Tweet parsedTweet = parseBody(jsonBody)
return parsedTweet
} catch (Throwable t) {
throw new TwitterError(t)
}
}

private String callTwitter(String id) {
// TODO: implementation
}

private Tweet parseBody(String jsonBody) {
// TODO: implementation
}
}

class Tweet {
String id
String userId
String username
String text
Date createdAt
}

class TwitterError extends RuntimeException {}

TwitterController plays main part here. Users call show action along with id of a tweet. This action is my subject under test. I've implemented some basic functionality. It's easier to focus on it while writing tests.


class TwitterController {
def twitterReaderService

def index() {
}

def show() {
Tweet tweet = twitterReaderService.readTweet(params.id)
if (tweet == null) {
flash.message = 'Tweet not found'
redirect(action: 'index')
return
}

[tweet: tweet]
}
}

Let's start writing a test from scratch. Most important thing here is that I use mock for my TwitterReaderService. I do not construct new TwitterReaderService(), because in this test I test only TwitterController. I am not interested in injected service. I know how this service is supposed to work and I am not interested in internals. So before every test I inject a twitterReaderServiceMock into controller:


import grails.test.mixin.TestFor
import spock.lang.Specification

@TestFor(TwitterController)
class TwitterControllerSpec extends Specification {
TwitterReaderService twitterReaderServiceMock = Mock(TwitterReaderService)

def setup() {
controller.twitterReaderService = twitterReaderServiceMock
}
}

Now it's time to think what scenarios I need to test. This line from TwitterReaderService is the most important:


Tweet readTweet(String id) throws TwitterError

You must think of this method like a black box right now. You know nothing of internals from controller's point of view. You're only interested what can be returned for you:

  • a TwitterError can be thrown
  • null can be returned
  • Tweet instance can be returned

This list is your test blueprint. Now answer a simple question for each element: "What do I want my controller to do in this situation?" and you have plan test:

  • show action should redirect to index if TwitterError is thrown and inform about error
  • show action should redirect to index and inform if tweet is not found
  • show action should show found tweet

That was easy and straightforward! And now is the best part: we use twitterReaderServiceMock to mock each of these three scenarios!

In Spock there is a good documentation about interaction with mocks. You declare what methods are called, how many times, what parameters are given and what should be returned. Remember a black box? Mock is your black box with detailed instruction, e.g.: I expect you that if receive exactly one call to readTweet with parameter '1' then you should throw me a TwitterError. Rephrase this sentence out loud and look at this:


1 * twitterReaderServiceMock.readTweet('1') >> { throw new TwitterError() }

This is a valid interaction definition on mock! It's that easy! Here is a complete test that fails for now:


import grails.test.mixin.TestFor
import spock.lang.Specification

@TestFor(TwitterController)
class TwitterControllerSpec extends Specification {
TwitterReaderService twitterReaderServiceMock = Mock(TwitterReaderService)

def setup() {
controller.twitterReaderService = twitterReaderServiceMock
}

def "show should redirect to index if TwitterError is thrown"() {
given:
controller.params.id = '1'
when:
controller.show()
then:
1 * twitterReaderServiceMock.readTweet('1') >> { throw new TwitterError() }
0 * _._
flash.message == 'There was an error on fetching your tweet'
response.redirectUrl == '/twitter/index'
}
}

| Failure: show should redirect to index if TwitterError is thrown(pl.refaktor.twitter.TwitterControllerSpec)
| pl.refaktor.twitter.TwitterError
at pl.refaktor.twitter.TwitterControllerSpec.show should redirect to index if TwitterError is thrown_closure1(TwitterControllerSpec.groovy:29)

You may notice 0 * _._ notation. It says: I don't want any other mocks or any other methods called. Fail this test if something is called! It's a good practice to ensure that there are no more interactions than you want.

Ok, now I need to implement controller logic to handle TwitterError.


class TwitterController {

def twitterReaderService

def index() {
}

def show() {
Tweet tweet

try {
tweet = twitterReaderService.readTweet(params.id)
} catch (TwitterError e) {
log.error(e)
flash.message = 'There was an error on fetching your tweet'
redirect(action: 'index')
return
}

[tweet: tweet]
}
}

My tests passes! We have two scenarios left. Rule stays the same: TwitterReaderService returns something and we test against it. So this line is the heart of each test, change only returned values after >>:


1 * twitterReaderServiceMock.readTweet('1') >> { throw new TwitterError() }

Here is a complete test for three scenarios and controller that passes it.


import grails.test.mixin.TestFor
import spock.lang.Specification

@TestFor(TwitterController)
class TwitterControllerSpec extends Specification {

TwitterReaderService twitterReaderServiceMock = Mock(TwitterReaderService)

def setup() {
controller.twitterReaderService = twitterReaderServiceMock
}

def "show should redirect to index if TwitterError is thrown"() {
given:
controller.params.id = '1'
when:
controller.show()
then:
1 * twitterReaderServiceMock.readTweet('1') >> { throw new TwitterError() }
0 * _._
flash.message == 'There was an error on fetching your tweet'
response.redirectUrl == '/twitter/index'
}

def "show should inform about not found tweet"() {
given:
controller.params.id = '1'
when:
controller.show()
then:
1 * twitterReaderServiceMock.readTweet('1') >> null
0 * _._
flash.message == 'Tweet not found'
response.redirectUrl == '/twitter/index'
}


def "show should show found tweet"() {
given:
controller.params.id = '1'
when:
controller.show()
then:
1 * twitterReaderServiceMock.readTweet('1') >> new Tweet()
0 * _._
flash.message == null
response.status == 200
}
}

class TwitterController {

def twitterReaderService

def index() {
}

def show() {
Tweet tweet

try {
tweet = twitterReaderService.readTweet(params.id)
} catch (TwitterError e) {
log.error(e)
flash.message = 'There was an error on fetching your tweet'
redirect(action: 'index')
return
}

if (tweet == null) {
flash.message = 'Tweet not found'
redirect(action: 'index')
return
}

[tweet: tweet]
}
}

The most important thing here is that we've tested controller-service interaction without logic implementation in service! That's why mock technique is so useful. It decouples your dependencies and let you focus on exactly one subject under test. Happy testing!

Apache HISE + Apache Camel

Check out this SlideShare Presentation: Apache HISE + Apache CamelView more presentations from Rafal Rusin.Check out this SlideShare Presentation: Apache HISE + Apache CamelView more presentations from Rafal Rusin.

Turing completeness II

Well, as I wrote in the previous post, sed is a Turing complete language. We can use it to implement some simple algorithms, or even a dc interpreter. But what does it really mean? How complex tasks may we achieve using plain sed?What about writin...Well, as I wrote in the previous post, sed is a Turing complete language. We can use it to implement some simple algorithms, or even a dc interpreter. But what does it really mean? How complex tasks may we achieve using plain sed?What about writin...