Formatting Java Time with Spring Boot using JSON

stf0-banner The aim of this post is to summarize and review ways of formatting Java Time objects using Spring Boot and Jackson library.

This post is organized into five steps. Each step represents one aspect of the issue and it is also related to one commit in the example project repository.

Step 0 – Prerequirements

Versions and dependencies

This tutorial is based on Spring Boot version 1.3.1.RELEASE with spring-boot-starter-web. It uses jackson-datatype-jsr310 from com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype in version 2.6.4, which is a default version of Spring Boot. All of these is based on Java 8.

The Code

In the example code repository, you can find one HTTP service made with Spring Boot. This service is a GET operation, which returns a class with Java Time objects. You can also find the integration test that deserializes the response.

Step 1 – The goal

I would like to return class Clock, containing LocalDate,LocalTime and LocalDateTime, preinitialized in constructor.

public final class Clock {
    private final LocalDate localDate;
    private final LocalTime localTime;
    private final LocalDateTime localDateTime;
    ...
}

Response class is serialized to JSON Map, which is a default behaviour. To some extent it is correct, but ISO-formatted Strings in response are preferable.

{  
    "localDate":{  
        "year":2016,
        "month":"JANUARY",
        "era":"CE",
        "dayOfYear":1,
        "dayOfWeek":"FRIDAY",
        "leapYear":true,
        "dayOfMonth":1,
        "monthValue":1,
        "chronology":{  
            "id":"ISO",
            "calendarType":"iso8601"
        }
    }
}

Integration testing is an appropriate way to test our functionality.

ResponseEntity resp = sut.getForEntity("http://localhost:8080/clock", Clock.class);

assertEquals(OK, resp.getStatusCode());
assertEquals(c.getLocalDate(), resp.getBody().getLocalDate());
assertEquals(c.getLocalTime(), resp.getBody().getLocalTime());
assertEquals(c.getLocalDateTime(), resp.getBody().getLocalDateTime());

Unfortunately, tests are not passing, because of deserialization problems. The exception with message is thrown can not instantiate from JSON object.

Step 2 – Adds serialization

First things first. We have to add JSR-310 module. It is a datatype module to make Jackson recognize Java 8 Date & Time API data types.

Note that in this example jackson-datatype-jsr310 version is inherited from spring-boot-dependencies dependency management.

com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype
      jackson-datatype-jsr310

Response is now consistent but still, not perfect. Dates are serialized as numbers:

{  
    "version":2,
    "localDate":[  
        2016,
        1,
        1
    ],
    "localTime":[  
        10,
        24
    ],
    "localDateTime":[  
        2016,
        1,
        1,
        10,
        24
    ],
    "zonedDateTime":1451640240.000000000
}

We are one step closer to our goal. Tests are passing now because this format can be deserialized without any additional deserializers. How do I know? Start an application server on commit Step 2 - Adds Object Mapper, then checkout to Step 1 - Introduce types and problems, and run integration tests without @WebIntegrationTest annotation.

Step 3 – Enables ISO formatting

ISO 8601 formatting is a standard. I’ve found it in many projects. We are going to enable and use it. Edit spring boot properties file application.properties and add the following line:

spring.jackson.serialization.WRITE_DATES_AS_TIMESTAMPS = false

Now, the response is something that I’ve expected:

{  
    "version":2,
    "localDate":"2016-01-01",
    "localTime":"10:24",
    "localDateTime":"2016-01-01T10:24",
    "zonedDateTime":"2016-01-01T10:24:00+01:00"
}

Step 4 – Adds on-demand formatting pattern

Imagine one of your client systems does not have the capability of formatting time. It may be a primitive device or microservice that treats this date as a collection of characters. That is why special formatting is required.

We can change formatting in response class by adding JsonFormat annotation with pattern parameter. Standard SimpleDateFormat rules apply.

@JsonFormat(pattern = "dd::MM::yyyy")
private final LocalDate localDate;
    
@JsonFormat(pattern = "KK:mm a")
private final LocalTime localTime;

Below there is a service response using custom @JsonFormat pattern:

{  
    "version":2,
    "localDate":"01::01::2016",
    "localTime":"10:24 AM",
    "localDateTime":"2016-01-01T10:24",
    "zonedDateTime":"2016-01-01T10:24:00+01:00"
}

Our tests are still passing. It means that this pattern is used for serialization in service and deserialization in tests.

Step 5 – Globally changes formatting

There are situations where you have to resign from ISO 8601 formatting in your whole application, and apply custom-made standards.

In this part, we will redefine the format pattern for LocalDate. This will change formatting of LocalDate in every endpoint of your API.

We have to define: – DateTimeFormatter with our pattern. – Serializer using defined pattern. – Deserializer using defined pattern. – ObjectMapper bean with custom serializer and deserializer. – RestTemplate that uses our ObjectMapper.

Bean ObjectMapper is defined with annotation @Primary, to override default configuration. My custom pattern for LocalDate is dd::MM::yyyy

public static final DateTimeFormatter FORMATTER = ofPattern("dd::MM::yyyy");
    
@Bean
@Primary
public ObjectMapper serializingObjectMapper() {
    ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
    JavaTimeModule javaTimeModule = new JavaTimeModule();
    javaTimeModule.addSerializer(LocalDate.class, new LocalDateSerializer());
    javaTimeModule.addDeserializer(LocalDate.class, new LocalDateDeserializer());
    objectMapper.registerModule(javaTimeModule);
    return objectMapper;
}

Definitions of serializer and deserializer for all LocalDate classes:

public class LocalDateSerializer extends JsonSerializer {
    
    @Override
    public void serialize(LocalDate value, JsonGenerator gen, SerializerProvider serializers) throws IOException {
        gen.writeString(value.format(FORMATTER));
    }
}
    
public class LocalDateDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer {
    
    @Override
    public LocalDate deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException {
        return LocalDate.parse(p.getValueAsString(), FORMATTER);
    }
}

Now, the response is formatted with our custom pattern:

{  
    "localDate":"01::01::2016"
}

Tests

When we define a custom serializer, our tests start to fail. It is because RestTemplate knows nothing about our deserializer. We have to create a custom RestTemplateFactory that creates RestTemplate with object mapper containing our deserializer.

@Configuration
public class RestTemplateFactory {
    
    @Autowired
    private ObjectMapper objectMapper;
    
    @Bean
    public RestTemplate createRestTemplate() {
        RestTemplate restTemplate = new RestTemplate();
        List converters = new ArrayList();
        MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter jsonConverter = new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter();
        jsonConverter.setObjectMapper(objectMapper);
        converters.add(jsonConverter);
        restTemplate.setMessageConverters(converters);
        return restTemplate;
    }
}

Conclusion

Custom formatting Dates is relatively simple, but you have to know how to set up it. Luckily, Jackson works smoothly with Spring. If you know other ways of solving this problem or you have other observations, please comment or let me know.

Blog from Michał Lewandowski personal blog. Photo Credit.

You May Also Like

Cross-platform mobile apps – possible or not?

What is Titanium and how it works. Titanium is an open-source solution for cross-platform, almost-native mobile app development. It has its own MVC, JavaScript and XML-based framework Alloy. Titanium is based on assumption, that each app can be divided into two parts: UI, which is platform-specific part and application core – business logic, common to all […]What is Titanium and how it works. Titanium is an open-source solution for cross-platform, almost-native mobile app development. It has its own MVC, JavaScript and XML-based framework Alloy. Titanium is based on assumption, that each app can be divided into two parts: UI, which is platform-specific part and application core – business logic, common to all […]

Inconsistent Dependency Injection to domains with Grails

I've encountered strange behavior with a domain class in my project: services that should be injected were null. I've became suspicious as why is that? Services are injected properly in other domain classes so why this one is different?

Constructors experiment

I've created an experiment. I've created empty LibraryService that should be injected and Book domain class like this:

class Book {
def libraryService

String author
String title
int pageCount

Book() {
println("Finished constructor Book()")
}

Book(String author) {
this()
this.@author = author
println("Finished constructor Book(String author)")
}

Book(String author, String title) {
super()
this.@author = author
this.@title = title
println("Finished constructor Book(String author, String title)")
}

Book(String author, String title, int pageCount) {
this.@author = author
this.@title = title
this.@pageCount = pageCount
println("Finished constructor Book(String author, String title, int pageCount)")
}

void logInjectedService() {
println(" Service libraryService is injected? -> $libraryService")
}
}
class LibraryService {
def serviceMethod() {
}
}

Book has 4 explicit constructors. I want to check which constructor is injecting dependecies. This is my method that constructs Book objects and I called it in controller:

class BookController {
def index() {
constructAndExamineBooks()
}

static constructAndExamineBooks() {
println("Started constructAndExamineBooks")
Book book1 = new Book().logInjectedService()
Book book2 = new Book("foo").logInjectedService()
Book book3 = new Book("foo", 'bar').logInjectedService()
Book book4 = new Book("foo", 'bar', 100).logInjectedService()
Book book5 = new Book(author: "foo", title: 'bar')
println("Finished constructor Book(Map params)")
book5.logInjectedService()
}
}

Analysis

Output looks like this:

Started constructAndExamineBooks
Finished constructor Book()
Service libraryService is injected? -> eu.spoonman.refaktor.LibraryService@2affcce2
Finished constructor Book()
Finished constructor Book(String author)
Service libraryService is injected? -> eu.spoonman.refaktor.LibraryService@2affcce2
Finished constructor Book(String author, String title)
Service libraryService is injected? -> null
Finished constructor Book(String author, String title, int pageCount)
Service libraryService is injected? -> null
Finished constructor Book()
Finished constructor Book(Map params)
Service libraryService is injected? -> eu.spoonman.refaktor.LibraryService@2affcce2

What do we see?

  1. Empty constructor injects dependencies.
  2. Constructor that invokes empty constructor explicitly injects dependencies.
  3. Constructor that invokes parent's constructor explicitly does not inject dependencies.
  4. Constructor without any explicit call declared does not call empty constructor thus it does not inject dependencies.
  5. Constructor provied by Grails with a map as a parameter invokes empty constructor and injects dependencies.

Conclusion

Always explicitily invoke empty constructor in your Grail domain classes to ensure Dependency Injection! I didn't know until today either!