Introduction
Brand new Spring Boot 2.0 has just been released and TouKs couldn’t wait to try it in the production. One of the newly added features that we investigated was metrics system based on Micrometer library (https://micrometer.io/). In this post I will cover some of our experiences with this so far.
The goal was to get basic HTTP request metrics, report them to InfluxDB and draw some fancy graphs in Grafana. In particular we needed:
- Throughput – total number of requests in given time unit
- Response status statistics – how many 200-like and 500-like response occurred
- Response time statistics: mean, median, percentiles
What was wrong with Dropwizard metrics
Nothing that I am aware of. Metrics Spring integration however is a different story….
Last stable release of Metrics Spring (v. 3.1.3) was in late 2015 and it was compatible with Dropwizard Metrics (v. 3.1.2). From this time Dropwizard Metrics moved to version 4 and 5, but Metrics Spring literally died. This causes a couple of rather unpleasant facts:
- There are some known bugs that will never be solved
- You can’t benefit from Dropwizard Metrics improvements
- Sooner or later you will use a library that depends on a different version of Dropwizard Metrics and it will hurt
As an InfluxDB user I was also facing some problems with reporting tags. After a couple of tries we ended up using an obscure Graphite interface that was luckily compatible with Influx.
Let’s turn on the metrics
Adding metrics to your Spring Boot project can be done in three very simple steps. First add a dependency to micrometer-registry-xxx, where xxx is your favourite metrics storage. In our case:
<dependency> <groupId>io.micrometer</groupId> <artifactId>micrometer-registry-influx</artifactId> </dependency>
Now it is time for just a little bit of configuration in application.yml:
management:
metrics:
export:
influx:
uri: http://localhost:8086
db: services
step: 5s ### <- (1)
And a proper configuration bean:
@Configuration public class MetricsConfig {
private static final Duration HISTOGRAM_EXPIRY = Duration.ofMinutes(10);
private static final Duration STEP = Duration.ofSeconds(5);
@Value
("${host_id}") private String hostId;
@Value
("${service_id}") private String serviceId;
@Bean
public MeterRegistryCustomizer < MeterRegistry > metricsCommonTags() { // (2)
return registry - > registry.config()
.commonTags("host", hostId, "service", serviceId) // (3)
.meterFilter(MeterFilter.deny(id - > { // (4)
String uri = id.getTag("uri");
return uri != null && uri.startsWith("/swagger");
}))
.meterFilter(new MeterFilter() {
@Override
public DistributionStatisticConfig configure(Meter.Id id, DistributionStatisticConfig config) {
return config.merge(DistributionStatisticConfig.builder().percentilesHistogram(true).percentiles(0.5, 0.75, 0.95) // (5)
.expiry(HISTOGRAM_EXPIRY) // (6)
.bufferLength((int)(HISTOGRAM_EXPIRY.toMillis() / STEP.toMillis())) // (7)
.build());
}
});
}
}
Simple as that. For sure it is not the minimal working example, but I believe some of our ideas are worth mentioning.
Dive into configuration
Config is rather self-explanatory, but let’s take a look at couple of interesting features.
(1) Step defines how often data is sent by reporter. This value should be related to your expected traffic, because you don’t want to see 90% of zeros.
(2) Be aware that there can be many reporters sharing the same config. Customising each behaviour can be done by using more specific type parameter e.g. InfluxMeterRegistry.
(3) Tags that will be added to every metric. As you can see it’s very handy for identifying hosts in a cluster.
(4) Skipping not important endpoints will limit unwanted data.
(5) A list of percentiles you would like to track
(6)(7) Histograms are calculated for some defined time window where more recent values have bigger impact on final value. The bigger time window you choose, the more accurate statistics are, but the less sudden will be changes of percentile value in case of very big or very small response time. It is also very important to increase buffer length as you increase expiry time.
Afterthought
We believe that migrating to Micrometer is worth spending time as configuration and reporting becomes simpler. The only thing that surprised us was reporting rate of throughput and status counts rather than cumulative values. But this is another story to be told…
Special thanks to Arek Burdach for support.
