DDevelopment & Design

Gerrit notifications via Rocket.Chat

Case

Gerrit often sends a lot of emails, especially if you take part in many projects. For a while we felt that sometimes it’s hard to notice the most important ones, like reviewers’ and Sputnik‘s comments on our changes. We use Rocket.Chat for text communication inside the company and most of us are connected throughout the day, so we thought it might be useful to get chat message notification every time a comment is added on one’s changes.

Gerrit hooks

Gerrit has a built-in mechanism for running hooks – scripts that are called whenever a specific event occurs. The script must be named the same as the hook. We created a bash script named comment-added, which is run every time someone adds a comment. Gerrit provides it with a lot of useful parameters, like project name, comment author, score, change owner, etc. Full documentation can be found here. After parsing those parameters, we can send a message to change owner on Rocket.Chat.

Gerrit hooks script have to be placed in a certain location. To avoid manually updating the files there, we set up a repository for hook scripts. They are periodically pulled to the correct location which simplifies the process of making changes to the scripts.

Integration with Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat has a pretty versatile REST API that allows us to send messages by calling curl from the comment-added script. Full documentation for the API can be found here. Currently, the API is in beta version, but so far we haven’t had any issues with it.

We previously set up a user that sends Jenkins automatic messages to our team chat and we reuse this user here. Firstly, we have to log in by calling api/v1/login endpoint:

curl https://<Rocket.Chat server address>/api/v1/login -d "username=<username>&password=<password>"

In response, we get a JSON with the logged user’s id and authorization token:

{
  "status": "success",
  "data": {
    "authToken": "<authorization token>",
    "userId": "<user id>"
  }
}

Next, we send a direct message to user by their username (in our case, we can get the username from change owner’s email), calling api/v1/chat.postMessage endpoint. This sends a direct message to the user, even if there was no previous conversation between the users – no need to set up a room or open chat. Example:

curl -H "X-Auth-Token: <authorization token>" \
  -H "X-User-Id: <user id>" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"channel\": \"@<recipient username>\", \"text\": \"<message>\"}" \
  https://<Rocket.Chat server address>/api/v1/chat.postMessage

Summary

We created a simple script to solve the issue of getting notified when we get comments on our changes. So far, the team seems pleased with how this works and finds it quite useful. We hope that it would be useful for you as well – full code can be found here.

— Previous article

Tired of exporting your OSGI metatype to client manually?

Next article —

Idiomatic Peeking with Java Stream API

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

Simple HBase ORM

When dealing with data stored in HBase, you are quick to come to a conclusion, that it is extremaly inconvenient to reach to it via HBase native API. It is very verbose and you always need to convert between bytes and simple types - a pain. While I wa...When dealing with data stored in HBase, you are quick to come to a conclusion, that it is extremaly inconvenient to reach to it via HBase native API. It is very verbose and you always need to convert between bytes and simple types - a pain. While I wa...
DDevelopment & Design

Mock Retrofit using Dagger and Mockito

Retrofit is one of the most popular REST client for Android, if you never use it, it is high time to start. There are a lot of articles and tutorial talking about Retrofit. I just would like to show how to mock a REST server during develop of app and i...Retrofit is one of the most popular REST client for Android, if you never use it, it is high time to start. There are a lot of articles and tutorial talking about Retrofit. I just would like to show how to mock a REST server during develop of app and i...
DDevelopment & Design

Thought static method can’t be easy to mock, stub nor track? Wrong!

No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from Specification.  The global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from Specification.  The global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)