Control your bandwidth using ntop

I was looking for tool which could help me check who is using my bandwidth. Here are requirements which I want from this kind of tool:local hosts bandwidth distribution – it is helpful when you are loosing your bandwidth and don’t know who abuse it in …

I was looking for tool which could help me check who is using my bandwidth. Here are requirements which I want from this kind of tool:

  1. local hosts bandwidth distribution – it is helpful when you are loosing your bandwidth and don’t know who abuse it in your local network
  2. remote hosts bandwidth distribution – it is useful in situation when you want to have control over DoS attacks for your public homepage or when your QoS are not set well

 

Gargoyle

My first shoot is to check what features can give me my TP-Link TL-WR941ND router. I’ve installed on it Gargoyle (modification of OpenWRT with some additional features) some time ago. It has some useful monitoring features:

  • bandwidth distribution pie charts which answer for my first requirement but I can’t check the time when bandwidth was used there
  • connections track – from this I can check two sides of connection (also remote host) and how much of data was send/received but it also doesn’t show this information in time domain and it is served in less friendly, text form

 

It was no exactly what I’m looking for. Therefor I checked what what can we find in OPKG (OpenWRT Package Management).

SNMP + NagiosGraph

I tried to find how I can link Nagios (with NagiosGraph) with my router because I already have some experience with this tools. I found out that there is check_snmp Nagios plugin which can realize this. In OPKG there is mini-snmpd package. It is light SNMP server implementation. You can run it after login by SSH to you router and execute this command:

After this you can check available from server data:
In returned MIB tree there are some useful data like server’s uptime, disk space and also interface’s bandwidth. The last one, stored in Round Robin Database and printed by NagiosGraph will give graphs of bandwidth usage in time domain. But will not show who exactly use bandwidth!

 

Other software

I continue searches in OpenWRT packages. I came across good OpenWRT wiki page: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/bwmon describing some available stuff.

 

ntop

Among other there is mentioned ntop – extensive application written in C with many views showing statistics of network protocols usage. Installation of this application on my router with 400MHz CPU will be not the best idea. So I tried to install it on my home server and only send data to it from router by fprobe. At first I installed ntop available from ubuntu 12.04 server’s APT repository. There is available 3:4.1.0+dfsg1-1 version. After some simple configuration steps ntop start drawing graphs.

 

I simulate situation when from remote server I was downloading a big file from my home server. I was disappointed when noticed that I can’t read that this situation taking place from ntop graphs.

 

listening on interface in promiscuous mode

Some time ago I’ve done tcpdump logs analyzer on my studies. I remind that interface working in promiscuous mode can collect all data about local network traffic just like the router. To enable this mode you should exec this command:

Or if you want to set this state persistent you should edit your /etc/network/interfaces to look like this:
If the server where you want to listen for all packages is a VirutalBox vhost you should also verify that it is set promiscuous mode to ”Allow all” in their network configuration like on screenshot below.

ntop v.5.0.2

After this settings we can run ntop on any server in our local network. I give a try for a development version which you can download from ntop homepage: http://www.ntop.org/get-started/download/. Configure script led me through necessary packages that you must install before compilation. After this I run make and sudo make install. To manage ntop using init scripts I used existing /etc/init.d/ntop script and just edited a line with location of DEAMON value – setting them to /usr/local/bin/ntop value. I also removed -n 0 switch from /etc/default/ntop because I hope that bug with DNS resolution is already fixed (it is a little note in config about it).

 

I started deamon by service ntop start. In syslog there was nothing alarming – ntop started collecting traffic statistics. After login I checked available features.

  • Network load – this page shows all load in our network in four time intervals: 10mins, last hour, last day, last month
  • Top talkers – similar to network load intervals, shows how hosts were using bandwidth in past
  • Traffic maps: Region map & hosts map – ntop is connected to Google Maps and shows where are located hosts that we are talking to
  • Activity: how changes activity of hosts in every hour
  • And other – there are other useful things like Protocol statistics, Map of connections between hosts generated in dot and many more
After some tests I noticed that now I have full control about how my network is used (also find out that I have some scheduled script that every minute send unnecessary MBs of data ;-)).

 

little fix

This tests help me find out that there is a little bug in page showing top talkers of an hour. I submitted patch fixing it to ntop’s request tracker if you are interested in: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3559097&group_id=17233&atid=367233. This is a patch to r5644.

On the end

My adventure with traffic monitoring tools ended on ntop. It is a great tool which fits my needs. Now I know who consumes my resources and can set QoS rules which make my internet connection more responsive.

You May Also Like

Thought static method can’t be easy to mock, stub nor track? Wrong!

No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from SpecificationThe global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from SpecificationThe global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)