DDevelopment & Design

Modular Web Application using Eclipse Snaps

Few days ago, new milestone 3.0.0.M03 of Eclipse Virgo was released. Final release of this well prepared OSGi-based application Server getting closer so I decided to take a look at how to use it to write simple modular web application.

What does it mean a modular web application in OSGi environment? I imagine that this application should:

1) Change their look after installation of some extensions.

2) Also we should be able to write new request handlers for our application or modify flow control of existed.

First idea which occurred to me how to resolve first mentioned problem is to use fragment bundles mechanism. Fragment bundles give opportunity to create bundles with resources and classes which will be accessible from host bundle classloader. A key use case of its was “providing translation files for different locales“. So we can do few fragments with jsp files which should be able to include in index servlet page. Also we can provide some configuration files with class names of new request handlers which could be created using java reflection.

But fragment bundles have some disadvantages. How we can read in specification: “The new content of the updated fragment must not be allowed to attach to the host bundles until the Framework is restarted or the host bundle is refreshed“. This mean that we cannot do installation of extention without refreshing host bundle. Also new jsps must be compiled as a part of host application’s jsps so it is second reason why host bundle should be restarted. The last thing is that fragment bundles can’t have Bundle Activator which is also useful in many cases.

Eclipse Virgo gives component which resolves this problems – Virgo Snaps. It is easy in use extension which helps create modular web application framework. Sources are available here

After build of project and copy artifacts to virgo:

cd build-snaps

ant jar

cd ..

cp org.eclipse.virgo.snaps.api/target/artifacts/org.eclipse.virgo.snaps.api.jar ${virgo.home}/repository/usr/

cp org.eclipse.virgo.snaps.core/target/artifacts/org.eclipse.virgo.snaps.core.jar ${virgo.home}/repository/usr/

… and restart of server, we are ready to use snaps.

In samples dir there is example menu-bar showing idea of Snaps. In host bundle – animal.menu.bar we can see in top.jsp usage of taglib snaps:

  • “> ${snap.properties[‘link.text’]}

 

 

It is simple way to iterate through snaps associated with this host. Only thing which we must to do is to add this snippet to MANIFEST.MF:

Snap-Host: animal.menu.bar;version="[1.0, 2.0)"

Snap-ContextPath: /cat

In first line we are manifesting that this snap will be used as a part of host animal.menu.bar. In the second that all servlets will be deployed in this subcontext of context of host.

In this example also were used properties from file snap.properties which are available in session as attribute properties of snap.

After install host bundle at url: http://localhost:8080/animal-menu-bar we can see page without menu items. After installation of new items are become available.

— Previous article

We wtorek (19 04 2011) dowiemy się co dobrego można znaleźć w JDK7.

Next article —

<!--:en-->Spring security authentication-success-handler-ref and authentication-failure-handler-ref does not work with KerberosServiceAuthenticationProvider<!--:-->

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

Agile Skills Project at my company

Unfulfilled programmers Erich Fromm, a famous humanist, philosopher and psychologist strongly believed that people are basically good. If he was right, then either our society is a mind-breaking dystopia or we have a great misfortune of working i... Unfulfilled programmers Erich Fromm, a famous humanist, philosopher and psychologist strongly believed that people are basically good. If he was right, then either our society is a mind-breaking dystopia or we have a great misfortune of working i...
DDevelopment & Design

Thought static method can’t be easy to mock, stub nor track? Wrong!

No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from Specification.  The global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from Specification.  The global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)