Insert into .. select… na oraclu gubi dane.

Problem dotyczy serwra w wersji Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 – 64bi i pobrania danych z serwera zdalnego w wersji Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.8.0 – 64bit Production.

Na serwerze zdalnym mamy tabelę z danymi do zaczytania.

Dla ustalenia uwagi niech nazywa się tab_1 i będzie utworzona poleceniem:

CREATE TABLE tab_1
(ID NUMBER,
param_id NUMBER,
param_value VARCHAR2(4000));

Na systemie do którego chcę pobrać z niej dane tworzę perspektywę:

create or replace view v_tab1 as select * from tab_1 @db_link;

Po wykonaniu polecenia select * from v_tab1; widzimy wszystkie dane.

Tworzymy teraz w systemie docelowym tabelę tymczasową tmp_data:

CREATE GLOBAL temporary TABLE tmp_data
(ID NUMBER,
param_id NUMBER,
param_value VARCHAR2(4000))  ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS;

i próbujemy wykonać polecenie

insert into tmp_data select  id,param_id,  param_value from v_tab1 where id BETWEEN :1 and :2;

i od razu sprawdzamy wynik

select * from tmp_data ;

I niestety w ostatniej kolumnie zamiast spodziewanych danych są same nulle.

Cofam transakcję:

Rollback;

Zachowanie dziwne, ale jakoś trzeba sobie poradzić i te dane pobrać.

Robię prawie to samo, ale pobierając dane wykonuję konkatenację ostatniej kolumny z pustym stringiem (czyli nullem).

insert into tmp_data select id,param_id, '' || param_value as param_value  from v_tab1 where id BETWEEN :1 and :2;
select * from tmp_data ;
rollback;

Tym razem dane w tabelce tymczasowej są prawidłowe.

Podobny efekt zaobserwowałem z inną tablą, gdzie ostatnia kolumna była typu number

W rzeczywistym systemie na którym zaobserwowałem problem.

You May Also Like

JBoss Envers and Spring transaction managers

I've stumbled upon a bug with my configuration for JBoss Envers today, despite having integration tests all over the application. I have to admit, it casted a dark shadow of doubt about the value of all the tests for a moment. I've been practicing TDD since 2005, and frankly speaking, I should have been smarter than that.

My fault was simple. I've started using Envers the right way, with exploratory tests and a prototype. Then I've deleted the prototype and created some integration tests using in-memory H2 that looked more or less like this example:

@Test
public void savingAndUpdatingPersonShouldCreateTwoHistoricalVersions() {
    //given
    Person person = createAndSavePerson();
    String oldFirstName = person.getFirstName();
    String newFirstName = oldFirstName + "NEW";

    //when
    updatePersonWithNewName(person, newFirstName);

    //then
    verifyTwoHistoricalVersionsWereSaved(oldFirstName, newFirstName);
}

private Person createAndSavePerson() {
    Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
    Person person = PersonFactory.createPerson();
    session.save(person);
    transaction.commit();
    return person;
}    

private void updatePersonWithNewName(Person person, String newName) {
    Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
    person.setFirstName(newName);
    session.update(person);
    transaction.commit();
}

private void verifyTwoHistoricalVersionsWereSaved(String oldFirstName, String newFirstName) {
    List<Object[]> personRevisions = getPersonRevisions();
    assertEquals(2, personRevisions.size());
    assertEquals(oldFirstName, ((Person)personRevisions.get(0)[0]).getFirstName());
    assertEquals(newFirstName, ((Person)personRevisions.get(1)[0]).getFirstName());
}

private List<Object[]> getPersonRevisions() {
    Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
    AuditReader auditReader = AuditReaderFactory.get(session);
    List<Object[]> personRevisions = auditReader.createQuery()
            .forRevisionsOfEntity(Person.class, false, true)
            .getResultList();
    transaction.commit();
    return personRevisions;
}

Because Envers inserts audit data when the transaction is commited (in a new temporary session), I thought I have to create and commit the transaction manually. And that is true to some point.

My fault was that I didn't have an end-to-end integration/acceptance test, that would call to entry point of the application (in this case a service which is called by GWT via RPC), because then I'd notice, that the Spring @Transactional annotation, and calling transaction.commit() are two, very different things.

Spring @Transactional annotation will use a transaction manager configured for the application. Envers on the other hand is used by subscribing a listener to hibernate's SessionFactory like this:

<bean id="sessionFactory" class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.annotation.AnnotationSessionFactoryBean" >        
...
 <property name="eventListeners">
     <map key-type="java.lang.String" value-type="org.hibernate.event.EventListeners">
         <entry key="post-insert" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="post-update" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="post-delete" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="pre-collection-update" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="pre-collection-remove" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="post-collection-recreate" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
     </map>
 </property>
</bean>

<bean id="auditEventListener" class="org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" />

Envers creates and collects something called AuditWorkUnits whenever you update/delete/insert audited entities, but audit tables are not populated until something calls AuditProcess.beforeCompletion, which makes sense. If you are using org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction manually, this is called on commit() when notifying all subscribed javax.transaction.Synchronization objects (and enver's AuditProcess is one of them).

The problem was, that I used a wrong transaction manager.

<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager" >
    <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
</bean>

This transaction manager doesn't know anything about hibernate and doesn't use org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction. While Synchronization is an interface from javax.transaction package, DataSourceTransactionManager doesn't use it (maybe because of simplicity, I didn't dig deep enough in org.springframework.jdbc.datasource), and thus Envers works fine except not pushing the data to the database.

Which is the whole point of using Envers.

Use right tools for the task, they say. The whole problem is solved by using a transaction manager that is well aware of hibernate underneath.

<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager" >
    <property name="sessionFactory" ref="sessionFactory"/>
</bean>

Lesson learned: always make sure your acceptance tests are testing the right thing. If there is a doubt about the value of your tests, you just don't have enough of them,