DDevelopment & Design

Creating charts in GWT was never so easy. (OFC GWT)

  • byRafal P
  • January 18, 2011
  • 3 minute read

In Java world there are many libaries which allow to create charts (with the most popular is JFree Chart Library). None of this libraries are however simple, powerfull and gives pretty looking charts. This is why I investigated Open Flash Chart which is library for charting written in flash. Fortunately there is a port for GWT which allows to use OFC in RIA applications. So in the next few paragraphs I will show how to use OFC GWT (this is the name of GWT port) and why this library is so amazing. Enjoy.

Starting point is OFC GWT homepage. This is the place from where porting libary (with OFC inside) could be downloaded.  I prefer to use maven  instead of downloading, so here is part of my pom.xml configured for OFC GWT. Notice that the library version is 1.3.0 but in the nearest future there will be release of new 2.0.1 version (now available in beta).

..
<br />
<repositories><br />
<repository><br />
<id> OFCGWT repo</id><br />
<url>http://logicaldoc.sourceforge.net/maven</url><br />
</repository><br />
</repositories><br />

…
<br />
<dependency><br />
<groupid>ofcgwt</groupid><br />
<artifactid>ofcgwt</artifactid><br />
<version>1.3.0</version><br />
</dependency><br />
..

Now, after the OFC GWT library is downloaded, it’s time to make some code. In OFC GWT there are many sort of charts such as: bar (horizontal, vertical), pie, scater, radar etc. All them are represented in GWT by ChartWidget class (which extends Widget). This class is a wrapper, which can be placed on any GWT panel, container just like normal GWT widget. ChartWidget renders chart on screen by communicating with OFC library by JSON.
JSON data, which describes chart to draw, have to be created by ChartData class. This is the heart of the OFC GWT port, the most important class. This class objects are used to configure title, axies, data and chart type to render. Below is the code which shows how easy is to use both above classes.

..
<br />
FlowPanel panel = new FlowPanel();

ChartWidget chart = new ChartWidget();
ChartData chartData = new ChartData(title);
chartData.setBackgroundColour(“#ffffff”);//white background
chartData.addElements(createPieChart());
chart.setSize(“350”, “350”);
chart.setJsonData(chartData.toString());

panel.add(chart);

..

Only one thing left – function which create pie chart. In OFC You can chose from various charts. All of them are easy and simmilar in use. There is a good demo app with source code in the library, where You can find out how to configure each graph. Here is my code, which creates animated and transparent pie chart without labels on graph.

<br />
private PieChart createPieChart() {<br />
PieChart pieChart = new PieChart();<br />
pieChart.setAlpha(0.3f);    //set transparency<br />
pieChart.setNoLabels(true); // w do not want labels on screen<br />
pieChart.setAnimate(true);<br />
pieChart.setGradientFill(true);<br />
pieChart.setColours("#779C00", "#0000ff");<br />
pieChart.setTooltip("#label# - #val#");<br />
pieChart.addSlices(new PieChart.Slice(30, "TV's in Poland")); //this should be passed in parameter<br />
pieChart.addSlices(new PieChart.Slice(70, "Radios in Poland"));//this should be passed in parameter<br />
return pieChart;<br />
}<br />

And thats all. This is all You need to draw pretty looking graphs. No playing with css’es or colors, no complicated building of data sets and what is the most important, not even line of server side code!

Here is the running example of OFC GWT charts, where You can see and experiment with different types and effects.

One more thing. OFC GWT is not only library to draw charts. It also allows to handle user interaction. This is done by IOnClickListener’s. More about themcould be found in OFC GWT JavaDocs.

More graph examples:

— Previous article

JMS redelivery with ActiveMQ and Servicemix

Next article —

Hibernate hbm2ddl won't create schema before creating tables

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

Thought static method can’t be easy to mock, stub nor track? Wrong!

No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from Specification.  The global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from Specification.  The global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)