DDevelopment & Design

Drawing arrows in JavaFX

Some time in the past, I was wondering what’s the easiest solution for drawing arrowconnections between shapes. The problem boils down to computing boundary point for given shape, which intersects with connecting line. The solution is not so difficult …Some time in the past, I was wondering what’s the easiest solution for drawing arrowconnections between shapes. The problem boils down to computing boundary point for given shape, which intersects with connecting line. The solution is not so difficult …

Some time in the past, I was wondering what’s the easiest solution for drawing arrowconnections between shapes. The problem boils down to computing boundary point for given shape, which intersects with connecting line.
The solution is not so difficult when we consider polygon shapes. But it becomes more difficult considering curves and far more difficult for generic SVG shapes.
In this article, I show a simple way to find such boundary points for generic SVG shapes, utilizing JavaFX “contains” method and simple bisection algorithm.
Following application does the job: Launch JNLP,Browse on GitHub.
Application allows to drag shapes to track shape boundaries.

So, “contains” method in JavaFX allows us to poll any 2D point for intersection with SVG shape. Next, we need to assume, that we know a point inside a shape, from which every ray has exactly one intersection. This includes star-like shapes and ellipses. Next, we can use simple bisection algorithm to find such boundary point. We cut off once length between two points is too small. Following snippet does the job:

Next, we need to draw arrows on the ends. In order to do that, we can use JavaFX Affine Transform, which is matrix transformation for SVG path. We need to compute transformation vectors for the matrix. This sounds scarry, but in fact is relatively easy. First vector in matrix is (targetPoint – sourcePoint) / length. Second one is perpendicular to it. Following code applies transformation:

— Previous article

<!--:pl-->import z bazy z błędnym kodowaniem<!--:-->

Next article —

Me on Hadoop on Parleys

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

Private fields and methods are not private in groovy

I used to code in Java before I met groovy. Like most of you, groovy attracted me with many enhancements. This was to my surprise to discover that method visibility in groovy is handled different than Java!

Consider this example:

class Person {
private String name
public  String surname

private Person() {}

private String signature() { "${name?.substring(0, 1)}. $surname" }

public String toString() { "I am $name $surname" }
}

How is this class interpreted with Java?

  1. Person has private constructor that cannot be accessed
  2. Field "name" is private and cannot be accessed
  3. Method signature() is private and cannot be accessed

Let's see how groovy interpretes Person:

public static void main(String[] args) {
def person = new Person()   // constructor is private - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

    person.@name = 'Mike'       // access name field directly - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

    person.name = 'John'        // there is a setter generated by groovy
println(person.toString())

    person.@surname = 'Foo'     // access surname field directly
println(person.toString())

    person.surname = 'Bar'      // access auto-generated setter
println(person.toString())

println(person.signature()) // call private method - compilation error in Java
}

I was really astonished by its output:

I am null null
I am Mike null
I am John null
I am John Foo
I am John Bar
J. Bar

As you can see, groovy does not follow visibility directives at all! It treats them as non-existing. Code compiles and executes fine. It's contrary to Java. In Java this code has several errors, pointed out in comments.

I've searched a bit on this topic and it seems that this behaviour is known since version 1.1 and there is a bug report on that: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GROOVY-1875. It is not resolved even with groovy 2 release. As Tim Yates mentioned in this Stackoverflow question: "It's not clear if it is a bug or by design". Groovy treats visibility keywords as a hint for a programmer.

I need to keep that lesson in mind next time I want to make some field or method private!