DDevelopment & Design

Integration Tests for SMX4 with Python

Integration tests and unit tests are important for project quality. Unit tests usually are well suited for developer to verify his changes in runtime. On the other hand, integration tests, are for target user to verify that project’s features in the way he interacts with project, work properly. In this article, I will show how to automate integration tests for ServiceMix 4 using SoapUI testrunner and a simple python script.
The idea is to spawn ServiceMix 4 Karaf console and interact with it using python expect library. During this interaction, SoapUI testrunner script is invoked in order to run SoapUI tests.
First, we need to grab SMX4_DIR and SOAPUI_DIR environment variables in our script, like this:

SMX4_DIR=os.getenv("SMX4_DIR")
SOAPUI_DIR=os.getenv("SOAPUI_DIR")

 
This way, we can invoke later our script using following shell command:

SMX4_DIR=/some/path SOAPUI_DIR=/some/other/path ./our-python-script

 
Then, we need to spawn ServiceMix 4 console by using python expect library:

import pexpect
import time
import sys
child = pexpect.spawn("bin/servicemix")
child.logfile = sys.stdout
child.expect("karaf.*>")
time.sleep(3)

 
Here, we set logfile to stdout in order to see our automated interaction with ServiceMix console. Then we need to wait for ServiceMix console command prompt, which would mean console is ready. Additionally, we need to wait a few seconds to avoid problems with running commands too early (which is a kind of small bug in ServiceMix). Then, we can install our features, which we want to test. This example starts Apache HISE test bundle, which loads also Apache HISE engine from dependencies.

child.sendline("features:addUrl mvn:org.apache.hise/hise-karaf/0.3.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/features");
child.expect("karaf.*>")
child.sendline("features:install hise-h2-test-example-osgi")
child.expect("karaf.*>")

 
Next, we need to wait until the feature is properly started. ServiceMix 4 OSGi container initializes bundles in background, so it’s not enough to wait for command prompt to have it started (there doesn’t seem to exist a “wait-until-started” console command).So we grep in a loop over installed bundles and see if status is started. In this example, we do 30 retries every second and fail our integration test script after this period, by raising exception.

child.sendline("features:addUrl mvn:org.apache.hise/hise-karaf/0.3.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/features");
rep=0
while True:
    child.sendline("osgi:list|grep -i hise-test-example-osgi")
    l=child.readline()
    l=child.readline()
    if re.match(".*Started", l) != None:
        break
    time.sleep(1)
    child.expect("karaf.*>")
    rep=rep+1
    if rep>30:
        raise Exception("Bundle not installed")

 
Next, we need to run SoapUI testrunner in order to execute test cases. We need to implement syscall method in order to fail integration tests if SoapUI testrunner completes with fault (non-zero exit code).

import os
def syscall(c):
    if os.system(c) != 0:
        raise Exception("Sys call failed: " + c)

syscall(SOAPUI_DIR + “/bin/testrunner.sh -f results hise-soapui-project.xml”)
At the end, we can exit gracefully from ServiceMix console by using shutdown command, like this:

child.sendline("shutdown")

 

And that’s it. Full code of integration test script is available in Apache HISE sources, from Apache repository http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hise/trunk/itest/itest.

— Previous article

NYAC & COOLuary 2010 review

Next article —

Using GORM standalone

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

JBoss Envers and Spring transaction managers

I've stumbled upon a bug with my configuration for JBoss Envers today, despite having integration tests all over the application. I have to admit, it casted a dark shadow of doubt about the value of all the tests for a moment. I've been practicing TDD since 2005, and frankly speaking, I should have been smarter than that.

My fault was simple. I've started using Envers the right way, with exploratory tests and a prototype. Then I've deleted the prototype and created some integration tests using in-memory H2 that looked more or less like this example:

@Test
public void savingAndUpdatingPersonShouldCreateTwoHistoricalVersions() {
    //given
    Person person = createAndSavePerson();
    String oldFirstName = person.getFirstName();
    String newFirstName = oldFirstName + "NEW";

    //when
    updatePersonWithNewName(person, newFirstName);

    //then
    verifyTwoHistoricalVersionsWereSaved(oldFirstName, newFirstName);
}

private Person createAndSavePerson() {
    Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
    Person person = PersonFactory.createPerson();
    session.save(person);
    transaction.commit();
    return person;
}    

private void updatePersonWithNewName(Person person, String newName) {
    Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
    person.setFirstName(newName);
    session.update(person);
    transaction.commit();
}

private void verifyTwoHistoricalVersionsWereSaved(String oldFirstName, String newFirstName) {
    List<Object[]> personRevisions = getPersonRevisions();
    assertEquals(2, personRevisions.size());
    assertEquals(oldFirstName, ((Person)personRevisions.get(0)[0]).getFirstName());
    assertEquals(newFirstName, ((Person)personRevisions.get(1)[0]).getFirstName());
}

private List<Object[]> getPersonRevisions() {
    Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
    AuditReader auditReader = AuditReaderFactory.get(session);
    List<Object[]> personRevisions = auditReader.createQuery()
            .forRevisionsOfEntity(Person.class, false, true)
            .getResultList();
    transaction.commit();
    return personRevisions;
}

Because Envers inserts audit data when the transaction is commited (in a new temporary session), I thought I have to create and commit the transaction manually. And that is true to some point.

My fault was that I didn't have an end-to-end integration/acceptance test, that would call to entry point of the application (in this case a service which is called by GWT via RPC), because then I'd notice, that the Spring @Transactional annotation, and calling transaction.commit() are two, very different things.

Spring @Transactional annotation will use a transaction manager configured for the application. Envers on the other hand is used by subscribing a listener to hibernate's SessionFactory like this:

<bean id="sessionFactory" class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.annotation.AnnotationSessionFactoryBean" >        
...
 <property name="eventListeners">
     <map key-type="java.lang.String" value-type="org.hibernate.event.EventListeners">
         <entry key="post-insert" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="post-update" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="post-delete" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="pre-collection-update" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="pre-collection-remove" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
         <entry key="post-collection-recreate" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
     </map>
 </property>
</bean>

<bean id="auditEventListener" class="org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" />

Envers creates and collects something called AuditWorkUnits whenever you update/delete/insert audited entities, but audit tables are not populated until something calls AuditProcess.beforeCompletion, which makes sense. If you are using org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction manually, this is called on commit() when notifying all subscribed javax.transaction.Synchronization objects (and enver's AuditProcess is one of them).

The problem was, that I used a wrong transaction manager.

<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager" >
    <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
</bean>

This transaction manager doesn't know anything about hibernate and doesn't use org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction. While Synchronization is an interface from javax.transaction package, DataSourceTransactionManager doesn't use it (maybe because of simplicity, I didn't dig deep enough in org.springframework.jdbc.datasource), and thus Envers works fine except not pushing the data to the database.

Which is the whole point of using Envers.

Use right tools for the task, they say. The whole problem is solved by using a transaction manager that is well aware of hibernate underneath.

<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager" >
    <property name="sessionFactory" ref="sessionFactory"/>
</bean>

Lesson learned: always make sure your acceptance tests are testing the right thing. If there is a doubt about the value of your tests, you just don't have enough of them,