Introducing camel-drools component

byPiotr Jagielski
May 19, 2010
4 minute read

Introduction In this post I’ll try to introduce

Apache Camel component for Drools library – a great an widely used Business Rules Management System. When we decided to use Drools 5 inside Servicemix for some big project, it turned out that there is no production-ready solution that will meet out requirements. The servicemix-drools component is lacking several very important features, eg:
* StatefulSession database persistence for long-running processes,
* support for Complex Event Processing (event-based rules),
* Apache Camel based deployment to ease rules consequence processing,
* Support for Drools unit testing framework. To satisfy those requirements, Maciek Próchniak created a set of utility classes, which helped us run Drools inside Camel route. Starting from this codebase, we did some refactoring, add few new features (eg. pluggable object persistance) and released camel-drools component on TouK Open Source Projects forge.

Example To summarize key features and show how to use camel-drools component, let’s try to implement an example taken from Drools Flow documentation:

There is kind-of ‘process’ where first Task1 and Task2 are created and can be executed in parallel. Task3 needs to be executed after completion of both Task1 and Task2.

Implementation The class Task have 2 fields, a

name and completed flag, we also need an id for session serialization:

public class Task implements Serializable {
    private static final long serialVersionUID = -2964477958089238715L;    
    private String name;
    private boolean completed;

    public Task(String name) {
        this(name, false);
    }

    public Task(String name, boolean completed) {
        this.name = name;
        this.completed = completed;
    }

    public String getName() {
        return name;
    }

    public boolean isCompleted() {
        return completed;
    }

    public long getId() {
        return name.hashCode();
    }
}

We also define another class representing the state of process, needed to fire rules in correct order. Using that model, we now can implement our ruleset, defined in

task.drl file:

import org.apache.camel.component.drools.stateful.*

global org.apache.camel.component.drools.CamelDroolsHelper helper

rule "init"
salience 100
    when
        $s : State(name=="start")
    then
        insert(new Task("Task1"));
        insert(new Task("Task2"));
        retract($s);
end

rule "all tasks completed"
    when
        not(exists Task(completed==false))
        not(exists State(name=="end"))
    then
        insert(new Task("Task3"));
end

rule "Task3 completed"
salience 30
    when 
        Task(name=="Task3", completed==true)
    then
        insert(new State("end"));
        helper.send("direct:completed", "completed");
end

In first rule – “init” we insert two tasks and then retract state object from the session to avoid recursive execution of that rule. Rule “all tasks completed” shows the power of Drools – we just declare that this rule is fired when “there are no incompleted tasks” and don’t have to specify which tasks. So this shows rather ‘declarative’ than ‘imperative’ way of development – we have much more expressiveness than just step-by-step actions which lead to some situation. The

CamelDroolsHelper is a wrapper for ProducerTemplate and can be used to send some message trough another Camel route as consequence of a rule. But how are Tasks mark as completed in Drools session? The idea is to expose session through Camel endpoint to allow insert or update objects, which are passed as body of exchanges:

public class TaskRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder {
    @Override
    public void configure() throws Exception {
        from("direct:drools")
            .setHeader("drools.key", constant(new MultiKey(new String[] {
                "process-1"
            })))
            .to("drools:task.drl?stateful=true");
        from("direct:completed").to("log:test");
    }
}

The Drools endpoint is described by

"drools:task.drl?stateful=true" URI. It loads definition of rules from task.drl file and runs endpoint in stateful mode (described next paragraph). When object is passed to this endpoint, it is inserted (or updated) to session and fireAllRules() method is called. Another important thing is “drools.key” header – it is used to distinguish sessions between “processes”. E.g. when we have some customer-oriented rules, we want to group facts and events in session per customer – by some customer id. When the “drools.key” is set to that id, sessions for different customers could be found and saved separately.

Stateful session persistence Camel-drools component can be used in two modes:

stateful *and *stateless. The main difference between those is session persistence – only in stateful mode session is stored in database. So long duration event rules are correctly handled only in this mode – and this is what we used in this example. Let’s look at Spring context definition:

task_id

As you can see, there are some requirements for database objects to handle session persistence correctly – two tables: one for KnowlegdeStatefulSession and one for objects (facts and events) persistence. You can name them freely, just provide those names to

sessionTable and objectTable properties of sessionDAO. A sequence for id generation is also needed.

Route and rules testing Here is example test for TaskRouteBuilder:

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public class TaskRouteBuilderTest extends TaskRouteBuilder {

    DefaultCamelContext ctx;
    ProducerTemplate tpl;
    MockSessionDAO dao;

    @Before
    public void makeContext() throws Exception {
        ctx = new DefaultCamelContext();
        ctx.addComponent("drools", new DroolsComponent(ctx));
        ApplicationContext appCtx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(
            new String[] {
                "camel-drools-context.xml",
                "mock-dao-context.xml"
            });
        dao = (MockSessionDAO) appCtx.getBean("sessionDAO");
        ctx.setRegistry(new ApplicationContextRegistry(appCtx));
        ctx.addRoutes(this);
        ctx.addRoutes(new RouteBuilder() {
            @Override
            public void configure() throws Exception {
                from("direct:completed").to("mock:test");
            }
        });
        ctx.start();
        tpl = ctx.createProducerTemplate();
    }

    @Test
    public void testUpdate() throws Exception {
        Endpoint endpoint = ctx.getEndpoint("direct:drools");
        tpl.requestBody(endpoint, new State("start"));
        SessionWithIdentifier session = dao.getSession();
        Assert.assertEquals(2, session.getSession().getFactHandles().size());
        tpl.requestBody(endpoint, new Task("Task1", true));
        tpl.requestBody(endpoint, new Task("Task2", true));
        Assert.assertEquals(3, session.getSession().getFactHandles().size());
        tpl.requestBody(endpoint, new Task("Task3", true));

        MockEndpoint mock = MockEndpoint.resolve(ctx, "mock:test");
        mock.expectedMessageCount(1);
        mock.setResultWaitTime(5000 L);
        mock.assertIsSatisfied();
    }
}

In setup method some required initialization is done – camel-drools-context.xml file is loaded and MockSessionDao created. The test first starts process by passing State object with “start” name to Drools session through Camel route. This should add Task1 and Task2 to session – and it’s tested by counting the factHadles in session. Next, Task1 and Task2 are updated by making them completed, which should result in Task3 present in session – another factHandle. Last step is to complete Task3 and check that last rule is executed by assertions on MockEndpoint. You can download source code for this example and whole component from

here – this is branch for Camel 1.x version, which we use in our project.

Tags:
java

Piotr Jagielski

— Previous article

GeeCON 2010 general impressions

Next article —

Hibernate annotations + Spring transactions in OSGI

Spock basics

byRafał Nowak
September 7, 2013

Spock (homepage) is like its authors say 'testing and specification framework'. Spock combines very elegant and natural syntax with the powerful capabilities. And what is most important it is easy to use.

One note at the very beginning: I assume that you are already familiar with principles of Test Driven Development and you know how to use testing framework like for example JUnit.

So how can I start?

Writing spock specifications is very easy. We need basic configuration of Spock and Groovy dependencies (if you are using mavenized project with Eclipse look to my previous post: Spock, Java and Maven). Once we have everything set up and running smooth we can write our first specs (spec or specification is equivalent for test class in other frameworks like JUnit of TestNG).

What is great with Spock is fact that we can use it to test both Groovy projects and pure Java projects or even mixed projects.

Let's go!

Every spec class must inherit from spock.lang.Specification class. Only then test runner will recognize it as test class and start tests. We will write few specs for this simple class: User class and few tests not connected with this particular class.

We start with defining our class:

import spock.lang.*

class UserSpec extends Specification {

}

Now we can proceed to defining test fixtures and test methods.

All activites we want to perform before each test method, are to be put in def setup() {...} method and everything we want to be run after each test should be put in def cleanup() {...} method (they are equivalents for JUnit methods with @Before and @After annotations).

It can look like this:

class UserSpec extends Specification {
    User user
    Document document

    def setup() {
        user = new User()
        document = DocumentTestFactory.createDocumentWithTitle("doc1")
    }

    def cleanup() {

    }
}

Of course we can use field initialization for instantiating test objects:

class UserSpec extends Specification {
    User user = new User()
    Document document = DocumentTestFactory.createDocumentWithTitle("doc1")

    def setup() {

    }

    def cleanup() {

    }
}

What is more readable or preferred? It is just a matter of taste because according to Spock docs behaviour is the same in these two cases.

It is worth mentioning that JUnit @BeforeClass/@AfterClass are also present in Spock as def setupSpec() {...} and def cleanupSpec() {...}. They will be runned before first test and after last test method.

First tests

In Spock every method in specification class, expect setup/cleanup, is treated by runner as a test method (unless you annotate it with @Ignore).

Very interesting feature of Spock and Groovy is ability to name methods with full sentences just like regular strings:

class UserSpec extends Specification {
    // ...

    def "should assign coment to user"() {
        // ...
    }
}

With such naming convention we can write real specification and include details about specified behaviour in method name, what is very convenient when reading test reports and analyzing errors.

Test method (also called feature method) is logically divided into few blocks, each with its own purpose. Blocks are defined like labels in Java (but they are transformed with Groovy AST transform features) and some of them must be put in code in specific order.

Most basic and common schema for Spock test is:

class UserSpec extends Specification {
    // ...

    def "should assign coment to user"() {
        given:
            // do initialization of test objects
        when:
            // perform actions to be tested
        then:
            // collect and analyze results
    }
}

But there are more blocks like:

setup
expect
where
cleanup

In next section I am going to describe each block shortly with little examples.

given block

This block is used to setup test objects and their state. It has to be first block in test and cannot be repeated. Below is little example how can it be used:

class UserSpec extends Specification {
    // ...

    def "should add project to user and mark user as project's owner"() {
        given:
            User user = new User()
            Project project = ProjectTestFactory.createProjectWithName("simple project")
        // ...
    }
}

In this code given block contains initialization of test objects and nothing more. We create simple user without any specified attributes and project with given name. In case when some of these objects could be reused in more feature methods, it could be worth putting initialization in setup method.

when and then blocks

When block contains action we want to test (Spock documentation calls it 'stimulus'). This block always occurs in pair with then block, where we are verifying response for satisfying certain conditions. Assume we have this simple test case:

class UserSpec extends Specification {
    // ...

    def "should assign user to comment when adding comment to user"() {
        given:
            User user = new User()
            Comment comment = new Comment()
        when:
            user.addComment(comment)
        then:
            comment.getUserWhoCreatedComment().equals(user)
    }

    // ...
}

In when block there is a call of tested method and nothing more. After we are sure our action was performed, we can check for desired conditions in then block.

Then block is very well structured and its every line is treated by Spock as boolean statement. That means, Spock expects that we write instructions containing comparisons and expressions returning true or false, so we can create then block with such statements:

user.getName() == "John"
user.getAge() == 40
!user.isEnabled()

Each of lines will be treated as single assertion and will be evaluated by Spock.

Sometimes we expect that our method throws an exception under given circumstances. We can write test for it with use of thrown method:

class CommentSpec extends Specification {
    def "should throw exception when adding null document to comment"() {
        given:
            Comment comment = new Comment()
        when:
            comment.setCommentedDocument(null)
        then:
            thrown(RuntimeException)
    }
}

In this test we want to make sure that passing incorrect parameters is correctly handled by tested method and that method throws an exception in response. In case you want to be certain that method does not throw particular exception, simply use notThrown method.

expect block

Expect block is primarily used when we do not want to separate when and then blocks because it is unnatural. It is especially useful for simple test (and according to TDD rules all test should be simple and short) with only one condition to check, like in this example (it is simple but should show the idea):

def "should create user with given name"() {
    given:
        User user = UserTestFactory.createUser("john doe")
    expect:
        user.getName() == "john doe"
}

More blocks!

That were very simple tests with standard Spock test layout and canonical divide into given/when/then parts. But Spock offers more possibilities in writing tests and provides more blocks.

setup/cleanup blocks

These two blocks have the very same functionality as the def setup and def cleanup methods in specification. They allow to perform some actions before test and after test. But unlike these methods (which are shared between all tests) blocks work only in methods they are defined in.

where - easy way to create readable parameterized tests

Very often when we create unit tests there is a need to "feed" them with sample data to test various cases and border values. With Spock this task is very easy and straighforward. To provide test data to feature method, we need to use where block. Let's take a look at little the piece of code:

def "should successfully validate emails with valid syntax"() {
    expect:
        emailValidator.validate(email) == true
    where:
        email }

In this example, Spock creates variable called email which is used when calling method being tested. Internally feature method is called once, but framework iterates over given values and calls expect/when block as many times as there are values (however, if we use @Unroll annotation Spock can create separate run for each of given values, more about it in one of next examples).

Now, lets assume that we want our feature method to test both successful and failure validations. To achieve that goal we can create few parameterized variables for both input parameter and expected result. Here is a little example:

def "should perform validation of email addresses"() {
    expect:
        emailValidator.validate(email) == result
    where:
        email         result }

Well, it looks nice, but Spock can do much better. It offers tabular format of defining parameters for test what is much more readable and natural. Lets take a look:

def "should perform validation of email addresses"() {
    expect:
        emailValidator.validate(email) == result
    where:
        email           | result
        "WTF"           | false
        "@domain"       | false
        "foo@bar.com"   | true
        "a@test"        | false
}

In this code, each column of our "table" is treated as a separate variable and rows are values for subsequent test iterations.

Another useful feature of Spock during parameterizing test is its ability to "unroll" each parameterized test. Feature method from previous example could be defined as (the body stays the same, so I do not repeat it):

@Unroll("should validate email #email")
def "should perform validation of email addresses"() {
    // ...
}

With that annotation, Spock generate few methods each with its own name and run them separately. We can use symbols from where blocks in @Unroll argument by preceding it with '#' sign what is a signal to Spock to use it in generated method name.

What next?

Well, that was just quick and short journey through Spock and its capabilities. However, with that basic tutorial you are ready to write many unit tests. In one of my future posts I am going to describe more features of Spock focusing especially on its mocking abilities.

DDevelopment & Design

Groovy, Callable and ExecutorService

byDominik Przybysz
September 7, 2015

Suppose you want submit job to ExecutorService. The Baroque versionYou could create a class that implements Callable:class MyJob implements Callable<Integer>{ @Override Integer call() throws Exception { return 42 }}and give it to ...