Spring Security by example: OpenID (login via gmail)

This is a part of a simple Spring Security tutorial: 1. Set up and form authentication 2. User in the backend (getting logged user, authentication, testing) 3. Securing web resources 4. Securing methods 5. OpenID (login via gmail) 6. OAuth2 (login v…This is a part of a simple Spring Security tutorial: 1. Set up and form authentication 2. User in the backend (getting logged user, authentication, testing) 3. Securing web resources 4. Securing methods 5. OpenID (login via gmail) 6. OAuth2 (login v…

This is a part of a simple Spring Security tutorial:

1. Set up and form authentication 

2. User in the backend (getting logged user, authentication, testing)

3. Securing web resources

4. Securing methods

5. OpenID (login via gmail)

6. OAuth2 (login via Facebook)

7. Writing on Facebook wall with Spring Social

OpenID is to form authentication, what DVCS is to centralized version control system.

Ok, but without the technical mumbo-jumbo: OpenID allows the user to use one account (like Gmail) to login to other services (websites) without having to remember anything and without worries about password security.

Easy enough?

And the best part is: chances are, you already have an account which is a provider to OpenID. Are you registered on Gmail, Yahoo, or even Blogger? You can already use it to login to other sites.

But why would you? Isn’t login/password good enough?

Have you ever wondered whether the service you are logging to, uses one-way password hashing or keeps the password as open text? Most users do not create password per site because they cannot remember more than, let’s say, three passwords. If one site keeps their password as open text, they are practically screwed. And more often than not, it’s the site that has the worst (or non-existing) security. Welcome to hell: all your bases are belong to us.

By the way, I know of only one site, which does SHA hashing on the client side (in javascript), so that the server has no way of knowing what the real password is: sprezentuj.pl

Kudos for that, though it smells like overengineering a bit :)

OpenID is pretty simple, and the process description at Wikipedia is practically everything you need, but as they say, one picture is worth 1000 words, so let’s look at a  picture. There is a loot you can find with google, but most of them are in big-arrows-pointing-some-boxes-notation, and I find easier to read a sequence diagram, so here is my take on it:

Read more »

You May Also Like

Private fields and methods are not private in groovy

I used to code in Java before I met groovy. Like most of you, groovy attracted me with many enhancements. This was to my surprise to discover that method visibility in groovy is handled different than Java!

Consider this example:

class Person {
private String name
public String surname

private Person() {}

private String signature() { "${name?.substring(0, 1)}. $surname" }

public String toString() { "I am $name $surname" }
}

How is this class interpreted with Java?

  1. Person has private constructor that cannot be accessed
  2. Field "name" is private and cannot be accessed
  3. Method signature() is private and cannot be accessed

Let's see how groovy interpretes Person:

public static void main(String[] args) {
def person = new Person() // constructor is private - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

person.@name = 'Mike' // access name field directly - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

person.name = 'John' // there is a setter generated by groovy
println(person.toString())

person.@surname = 'Foo' // access surname field directly
println(person.toString())

person.surname = 'Bar' // access auto-generated setter
println(person.toString())

println(person.signature()) // call private method - compilation error in Java
}

I was really astonished by its output:

I am null null
I am Mike null
I am John null
I am John Foo
I am John Bar
J. Bar

As you can see, groovy does not follow visibility directives at all! It treats them as non-existing. Code compiles and executes fine. It's contrary to Java. In Java this code has several errors, pointed out in comments.

I've searched a bit on this topic and it seems that this behaviour is known since version 1.1 and there is a bug report on that: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GROOVY-1875. It is not resolved even with groovy 2 release. As Tim Yates mentioned in this Stackoverflow question: "It's not clear if it is a bug or by design". Groovy treats visibility keywords as a hint for a programmer.

I need to keep that lesson in mind next time I want to make some field or method private!