DDevelopment & Design

Hibernate hbm2ddl won’t create schema before creating tables

Situation I have a local H2 in memory database for integration tests and an Oracle db for production. I do not control the Oracle DB model. The in memory H2 database is created automatically by adding <prop key=”hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto”>update&l…Situation I have a local H2 in memory database for integration tests and an Oracle db for production. I do not control the Oracle DB model. The in memory H2 database is created automatically by adding <prop key=”hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto”>update&l…

Situation I have a local H2 in memory database for integration tests and an Oracle db for production. I do not control the Oracle DB model. The in memory H2 database is created automatically by adding

update

  to hibernate properties in AnnotationSessionFactoryBean. The definition of the entity stored in DB points to a schema

@Entity
@Table(name = "business_operations", schema = "sowa")
public class BusinessOperation {
...

The problem When creating the H2 database, Hibernate won’t create the schema before creating tables. As a result it will show errors when trying to create the tables in non existing schema and fail in any query (queries will be run with sowa.business_operations).

2011-01-18 15:13:30,884 INFO [org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaUpdate] - Running hbm2ddl schema update
2011-01-18 15:13:30,885 INFO [org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaUpdate] - fetching database metadata
2011-01-18 15:13:30,915 INFO [org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaUpdate] - updating schema
2011-01-18 15:13:30,927 INFO [org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.DatabaseMetadata] - table not found: business_operations
2011-01-18 15:13:30,941 ERROR [org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaUpdate] - Unsuccessful: create table sowa.business_operations 
2011-01-18 15:13:30,942 ERROR [org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaUpdate] - 
Schema "SOWA" not found;

Turns out this bug is reported and open since 2006:

link. The solution The solution to this problem is to create the schema before hibernate’s hbm2ddl turns on. That would be easy with H2 if we could tell H2 to initialize itself like this:

database.url=jdbc:h2:mem:;INIT=RUNSCRIPT FROM 'src/main/resources/scripts/create.sql';

All seems nice, except H2 RUNSCRIPT FROM command doesn’t work with relative resources as you may expect. Fortunatelly INIT allows us to give any commands, not just point to a script, so this little change will solve the problem:

database.url=jdbc:h2:mem:;INIT=create schema IF NOT EXISTS sowa

Yeah, I know it’s obvious and simple stupid, but looking at all the questions on all the mailing lists in google I may have just saved a little bit of somebody’s time.

Solution Architect @ TouK

— Previous article

Creating charts in GWT was never so easy. (OFC GWT)

Next article —

Insert into .. select... na oraclu gubi dane.

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

Private fields and methods are not private in groovy

I used to code in Java before I met groovy. Like most of you, groovy attracted me with many enhancements. This was to my surprise to discover that method visibility in groovy is handled different than Java!

Consider this example:

class Person {
private String name
public  String surname

private Person() {}

private String signature() { "${name?.substring(0, 1)}. $surname" }

public String toString() { "I am $name $surname" }
}

How is this class interpreted with Java?

  1. Person has private constructor that cannot be accessed
  2. Field "name" is private and cannot be accessed
  3. Method signature() is private and cannot be accessed

Let's see how groovy interpretes Person:

public static void main(String[] args) {
def person = new Person()   // constructor is private - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

    person.@name = 'Mike'       // access name field directly - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

    person.name = 'John'        // there is a setter generated by groovy
println(person.toString())

    person.@surname = 'Foo'     // access surname field directly
println(person.toString())

    person.surname = 'Bar'      // access auto-generated setter
println(person.toString())

println(person.signature()) // call private method - compilation error in Java
}

I was really astonished by its output:

I am null null
I am Mike null
I am John null
I am John Foo
I am John Bar
J. Bar

As you can see, groovy does not follow visibility directives at all! It treats them as non-existing. Code compiles and executes fine. It's contrary to Java. In Java this code has several errors, pointed out in comments.

I've searched a bit on this topic and it seems that this behaviour is known since version 1.1 and there is a bug report on that: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GROOVY-1875. It is not resolved even with groovy 2 release. As Tim Yates mentioned in this Stackoverflow question: "It's not clear if it is a bug or by design". Groovy treats visibility keywords as a hint for a programmer.

I need to keep that lesson in mind next time I want to make some field or method private!

DDevelopment & Design

HISE

HISE stands for Human Interactions Service Engine.I have recently posted a proposal, which was accepted by Apache ODE PMC, which means the development will start soon.If you are interested in this project, you are welcome to join us.HISE stands for Human Interactions Service Engine.I have recently posted a proposal, which was accepted by Apache ODE PMC, which means the development will start soon.If you are interested in this project, you are welcome to join us.