DDevelopment & Design

JMS redelivery with ActiveMQ and Servicemix

The other day I felt a compelling need to implement a JMS redelivery scenario. The exact scenario I’d been trying to handle was:

  1. my message is in an ActiveMQ queue or topic
  2. its processing fails, because of some exception – ie. database access exception due to server nonavailability
  3. since we get an exception, the message is not handled properly, we may want to retry processing attempt some time later
  4. of course, for the redelivery to happen we need the message to stay in the ActiveMQ queue – fetching messages from the queue will be stopped until the redelivery succeeds or expires

See how this can be done after the jump :)

For this to happen, I’ve tried implementing Apache Camel route, but as it turns out, Camel fails to deliver facilities for exact JMS redelivery. It is possible to set JMS connection in transacted mode, but the redeliveries happen one after another and fixed times.

What I’ve ended up doing was implement a servicemix-jms endpoint. I’ve used this configuration for it:


            activemq/connectionFactory

            activemq/resourceAdapter

As you can see, we lookup a couple of things in JNDI registry, so you need to have them configured on the Servicemix side – a sample config presented farther in this entry.

The bean responsible for configuring redelivery settings is activationSpec. You can set various things with it, like:

  • initial redelivery delay
  • maximum number of redeliveries
  • backoff multiplier
  • …

What is really important in jms:endpoint config for this to work are:

  • processorName=”jca”
  • rollbackOnError=”true”

Servicemix should have the following entries in its jndi registry:

          

(...) 

       xmlns:jencks="http://jencks.org/2.0"
       xmlns:amqra="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/ra" -->

When the redeliveries are exhausted, message is routed to global Dead Letter Queue called ActiveMQ.DLQ. Since this is a single bag for all the failed messages from all queues, you may want to configure this aspect differently. For example you can tell ActiveMQ to create a single DLQ for each queue. Use this config to achieve it – the changes should be made to Broker configuration.


        

            

  ...

More on the subject of redelivieries in ActiveMQ can be found at http://activemq.apache.org/message-redelivery-and-dlq-handling.html.

— Previous article

Oracle ODBC dla Windows

Next article —

Creating charts in GWT was never so easy. (OFC GWT)

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

Agile Skills Project at my company

Unfulfilled programmers Erich Fromm, a famous humanist, philosopher and psychologist strongly believed that people are basically good. If he was right, then either our society is a mind-breaking dystopia or we have a great misfortune of working i... Unfulfilled programmers Erich Fromm, a famous humanist, philosopher and psychologist strongly believed that people are basically good. If he was right, then either our society is a mind-breaking dystopia or we have a great misfortune of working i...
DDevelopment & Design

Private fields and methods are not private in groovy

I used to code in Java before I met groovy. Like most of you, groovy attracted me with many enhancements. This was to my surprise to discover that method visibility in groovy is handled different than Java!

Consider this example:

class Person {
private String name
public  String surname

private Person() {}

private String signature() { "${name?.substring(0, 1)}. $surname" }

public String toString() { "I am $name $surname" }
}

How is this class interpreted with Java?

  1. Person has private constructor that cannot be accessed
  2. Field "name" is private and cannot be accessed
  3. Method signature() is private and cannot be accessed

Let's see how groovy interpretes Person:

public static void main(String[] args) {
def person = new Person()   // constructor is private - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

    person.@name = 'Mike'       // access name field directly - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

    person.name = 'John'        // there is a setter generated by groovy
println(person.toString())

    person.@surname = 'Foo'     // access surname field directly
println(person.toString())

    person.surname = 'Bar'      // access auto-generated setter
println(person.toString())

println(person.signature()) // call private method - compilation error in Java
}

I was really astonished by its output:

I am null null
I am Mike null
I am John null
I am John Foo
I am John Bar
J. Bar

As you can see, groovy does not follow visibility directives at all! It treats them as non-existing. Code compiles and executes fine. It's contrary to Java. In Java this code has several errors, pointed out in comments.

I've searched a bit on this topic and it seems that this behaviour is known since version 1.1 and there is a bug report on that: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GROOVY-1875. It is not resolved even with groovy 2 release. As Tim Yates mentioned in this Stackoverflow question: "It's not clear if it is a bug or by design". Groovy treats visibility keywords as a hint for a programmer.

I need to keep that lesson in mind next time I want to make some field or method private!