SIP & SDP – Session Description Protocol

Protokołu SIP jest protokołem sygnalizacyjnym używanym do inicjowania sesji multimedialnych. SIP umożliwiają realizacje negocjacji charakterystyki sesji oraz jej aktualizacje ale sam w sobie nie zawiera mechanizmów do opisu kształtu sesji, przenoszonej za pomocą protkołu RTP. W tym celu SIP wykorzystuje protokół SDP (Session Descriptions Protocol)
wchodzący bezpośrednio w skład komunikatu. SDP zawiera informacje o rodzaju
mediów, kodekach i ich parametrach, adresach IP, kierunku strumieniów, dostępnym pasmie itp.

Opis sesji:

  • v= (protocol version) – wersja protokołu -> “0”
  • o= (originator and session identifier) – zrodlo i identyfikator sesji -> “dowolna_nazwa id_sesji wersja_sesji IN (IP4|IP6) adresIP_zródła_sesji”
  • s= (session subject) – temat sesjii -> “-“
  • i=* (session information) – opis sesji -> nie używany
  • u=* (URI of description) – uri dodatkowe opisu sesji -> nie używany
  • e=* (email address) – adres email osoby odpowiedzialnej za sesje -> nie używany
  • p=* (phone number) – numer telefoniczny osoby odpowiedzialnej za sesje -> nie używany
  • c=* (connection information) – opis połaczenia, nie wymagany jeśli obecny dla każdego strumienia mediów -> “IN (IP4|IP6) adresIP”
  • b=* (zero or more bandwidth information lines) – sugerowane pasmo -> nie używany
  • One or more time descriptions
  • z=* (time zone adjustments)- definicja strefy czasu -> nie używany
  • k=* (encryption key) – klucz szyfrujący -> nie używane
  • a=* (zero or more session attribute lines) – atrybuty: sendonly – jeśli strona tylko chce wysyłać media, recvonly – jeśli strona chce tylko odbierać media, inactive – bez mediów, sendrecv – jeśli strona chce wysyłać i odbierać media
  • Zero or more media descriptions

Opis Czasu:

  • t= (time the session is active) – czas sesji -> “0 0”
  • r=* (zero or more repeat times) – cykliczność sesji -> nie używany

Opis Mediów:

  • m= (media name and transport address) – opis mediów -> “(audio|video|text) RTP/AVP opis danych medialnych”
  • i=* (media title) – opis mediów -> nie używany
  • c=* (connection information) – opis połaczenia, nie wymagany jeśli obecny w opisie sesji, nadpisuje wartość z opisu sesji -> “IN (IP4|IP6) AdresIP”
  • b=* (zero or more bandwidth information lines) – sugerowane pasmo -> nie używany
  • k=* (encryption key) – klucz szyfrujący -> nie używane
  • a=* (zero or more media attribute lines)  – atrybuty strumienia, nadpisują atrybuty zdefiniowane w opisie sesji: sendonly – jeśli strona tylko chce wysyłać media, recvonly
    – jeśli strona chce tylko odbierać media, inactive – bez mediów,
    sendrecv – jeśli strona chce wysyłać i odbierać media, rtcp – port dla rtcp jesli nie, ptime – dlugosc mediów w sekunadach w przesylanym pakiecie, rtpmap – mapuje numer typu zawartosci do konkretnego kodeka i jego czestotliwosci, fmtp – umożliwia mapowanie parametrow tak aby sdp nie musialo tego rozumiec
You May Also Like

Thought static method can’t be easy to mock, stub nor track? Wrong!

No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from SpecificationThe global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from SpecificationThe global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)