Using XML processing typically simplifies a developer’s job–but not when you’re programming in c++. Ever wish someone would create the C++ equivalent of XMLBeans? Someone has. Find out how this new open-source tool fills a serious gap in the C++ software environment.
You May Also Like
Integration testing custom validation constraints in Jersey 2
- byPiotr Jagielski
- October 26, 2013
I recently joined a team trying to switch a monolithic legacy system into set of RESTful services in Java. They decided to use latest 2.x version of Jersey as a REST container which was not a first choice for me, since I’m not a big fan of JSR-* specs. But now I must admit that JAX-RS 2.x is doing things right: requires almost zero boilerplate code, support auto-discovery of features and prefers convention over configuration like other modern frameworks. Since the spec is still young, it’s hard to find good tutorials and kick-off projects with some working code. I created jersey2-starter project on GitHub which can be used as starting point for your own production-ready RESTful service. In this post I’d like to cover how to implement and integration test your own validation constraints of REST resources.
Custom constraints
One of the issues which bothers me when coding REST in Java is littering your class model with annotations. Suppose you want to build a simple Todo list REST service, when using Jackson, validation and Spring Data, you can easily end up with this as your entity class:
@Document
public class Todo {
private Long id;
@NotNull
private String description;
@NotNull
private Boolean completed;
@NotNull
private DateTime dueDate;
@JsonCreator
public Todo(@JsonProperty("description") String description, @JsonProperty("dueDate") DateTime dueDate) {
this.description = description;
this.dueDate = dueDate;
this.completed = false;
}
// getters and setters
}
Your domain model is now effectively blured by messy annotations almost everywhere. Let’s see what we can do with validation constraints (@NotNulls). Some may say that you could introduce some DTO layer with own validation rules, but it conflicts for me with pure REST API design, which stands that you operate on resources which should map to your domain classes. On the other hand - what does it mean that Todo object is valid? When you create a Todo you should provide a description and due date, but what when you’re updating? You should be able to change any of description, due date (postponing) and completion flag (marking as done) - but you should provide at least one of these as valid modification. So my idea is to introduce custom validation constraints, different ones for creation and modification:
@Target({TYPE, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = ValidForCreation.Validator.class)
public @interface ValidForCreation {
//...
class Validator implements ConstraintValidator<ValidForCreation, Todo> {
/...
@Override
public boolean isValid(Todo todo, ConstraintValidatorContext constraintValidatorContext) {
return todo != null
&& todo.getId() == null
&& todo.getDescription() != null
&& todo.getDueDate() != null;
}
}
}
@Target({TYPE, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = ValidForModification.Validator.class)
public @interface ValidForModification {
//...
class Validator implements ConstraintValidator<ValidForModification, Todo> {
/...
@Override
public boolean isValid(Todo todo, ConstraintValidatorContext constraintValidatorContext) {
return todo != null
&& todo.getId() == null
&& (todo.getDescription() != null || todo.getDueDate() != null || todo.isCompleted() != null);
}
}
}
And now you can move validation annotations to the definition of a REST endpoint:
@POST
@Consumes(APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response create(@ValidForCreation Todo todo) {...}
@PUT
@Consumes(APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response update(@ValidForModification Todo todo) {...}
And now you can remove those NotNulls from your model.
Integration testing
There are in general two approaches to integration testing:
- test is being run on separate JVM than the app, which is deployed on some other integration environment
- test deploys the application programmatically in the setup block.
Both of these have their pros and cons, but for small enough servoces, I personally prefer the second approach. It’s much easier to setup and you have only one JVM started, which makes debugging really easy. You can use a generic framework like Arquillian for starting your application in a container environment, but I prefer simple solutions and just use emdedded Jetty. To make test setup 100% production equivalent, I’m creating full Jetty’s WebAppContext and have to resolve all runtime dependencies for Jersey auto-discovery to work. This can be simply achieved with Maven resolved from Shrinkwrap - an Arquillian subproject:
WebAppContext webAppContext = new WebAppContext();
webAppContext.setResourceBase("src/main/webapp");
webAppContext.setContextPath("/");
File[] mavenLibs = Maven.resolver().loadPomFromFile("pom.xml")
.importCompileAndRuntimeDependencies()
.resolve().withTransitivity().asFile();
for (File file: mavenLibs) {
webAppContext.getMetaData().addWebInfJar(new FileResource(file.toURI()));
}
webAppContext.getMetaData().addContainerResource(new FileResource(new File("./target/classes").toURI()));
webAppContext.setConfigurations(new Configuration[] {
new AnnotationConfiguration(),
new WebXmlConfiguration(),
new WebInfConfiguration()
});
server.setHandler(webAppContext);
(this Stackoverflow thread inspired me a lot here)
Now it’s time for the last part of the post: parametrizing our integration tests. Since we want to test validation constraints, there are many edge paths to check (and make your code coverage close to 100%). Writing one test per each case could be a bad idea. Among the many solutions for JUnit I’m most convinced to the Junit Params by Pragmatists team. It’s really simple and have nice concept of JQuery-like helper for creating providers. Here is my tests code (I’m also using builder pattern here to create various kinds of Todos):
@Test
@Parameters(method = "provideInvalidTodosForCreation")
public void shouldRejectInvalidTodoWhenCreate(Todo todo) {
Response response = createTarget().request().post(Entity.json(todo));
assertThat(response.getStatus()).isEqualTo(BAD_REQUEST.getStatusCode());
}
private static Object[] provideInvalidTodosForCreation() {
return $(
new TodoBuilder().withDescription("test").build(),
new TodoBuilder().withDueDate(DateTime.now()).build(),
new TodoBuilder().withId(123L).build(),
new TodoBuilder().build()
);
}
OK, enough of reading, feel free to clone the project and start writing your REST services!
I recently joined a team trying to switch a monolithic legacy system into set of RESTful services in Java. They decided to use latest 2.x version of Jersey as a REST container which was not a first choice for me, since I’m not a big fan of JSR-* specs. But now I must admit that JAX-RS 2.x is doing things right: requires almost zero boilerplate code, support auto-discovery of features and prefers convention over configuration like other modern frameworks. Since the spec is still young, it’s hard to find good tutorials and kick-off projects with some working code. I created jersey2-starter project on GitHub which can be used as starting point for your own production-ready RESTful service. In this post I’d like to cover how to implement and integration test your own validation constraints of REST resources.
Custom constraints
One of the issues which bothers me when coding REST in Java is littering your class model with annotations. Suppose you want to build a simple Todo list REST service, when using Jackson, validation and Spring Data, you can easily end up with this as your entity class:
@Document
public class Todo {
private Long id;
@NotNull
private String description;
@NotNull
private Boolean completed;
@NotNull
private DateTime dueDate;
@JsonCreator
public Todo(@JsonProperty("description") String description, @JsonProperty("dueDate") DateTime dueDate) {
this.description = description;
this.dueDate = dueDate;
this.completed = false;
}
// getters and setters
}
Your domain model is now effectively blured by messy annotations almost everywhere. Let’s see what we can do with validation constraints (@NotNulls). Some may say that you could introduce some DTO layer with own validation rules, but it conflicts for me with pure REST API design, which stands that you operate on resources which should map to your domain classes. On the other hand - what does it mean that Todo object is valid? When you create a Todo you should provide a description and due date, but what when you’re updating? You should be able to change any of description, due date (postponing) and completion flag (marking as done) - but you should provide at least one of these as valid modification. So my idea is to introduce custom validation constraints, different ones for creation and modification:
@Target({TYPE, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = ValidForCreation.Validator.class)
public @interface ValidForCreation {
//...
class Validator implements ConstraintValidator<ValidForCreation, Todo> {
/...
@Override
public boolean isValid(Todo todo, ConstraintValidatorContext constraintValidatorContext) {
return todo != null
&& todo.getId() == null
&& todo.getDescription() != null
&& todo.getDueDate() != null;
}
}
}
@Target({TYPE, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = ValidForModification.Validator.class)
public @interface ValidForModification {
//...
class Validator implements ConstraintValidator<ValidForModification, Todo> {
/...
@Override
public boolean isValid(Todo todo, ConstraintValidatorContext constraintValidatorContext) {
return todo != null
&& todo.getId() == null
&& (todo.getDescription() != null || todo.getDueDate() != null || todo.isCompleted() != null);
}
}
}
And now you can move validation annotations to the definition of a REST endpoint:
@POST
@Consumes(APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response create(@ValidForCreation Todo todo) {...}
@PUT
@Consumes(APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response update(@ValidForModification Todo todo) {...}
And now you can remove those NotNulls from your model.
Integration testing
There are in general two approaches to integration testing:
- test is being run on separate JVM than the app, which is deployed on some other integration environment
- test deploys the application programmatically in the setup block.
Both of these have their pros and cons, but for small enough servoces, I personally prefer the second approach. It’s much easier to setup and you have only one JVM started, which makes debugging really easy. You can use a generic framework like Arquillian for starting your application in a container environment, but I prefer simple solutions and just use emdedded Jetty. To make test setup 100% production equivalent, I’m creating full Jetty’s WebAppContext and have to resolve all runtime dependencies for Jersey auto-discovery to work. This can be simply achieved with Maven resolved from Shrinkwrap - an Arquillian subproject:
WebAppContext webAppContext = new WebAppContext();
webAppContext.setResourceBase("src/main/webapp");
webAppContext.setContextPath("/");
File[] mavenLibs = Maven.resolver().loadPomFromFile("pom.xml")
.importCompileAndRuntimeDependencies()
.resolve().withTransitivity().asFile();
for (File file: mavenLibs) {
webAppContext.getMetaData().addWebInfJar(new FileResource(file.toURI()));
}
webAppContext.getMetaData().addContainerResource(new FileResource(new File("./target/classes").toURI()));
webAppContext.setConfigurations(new Configuration[] {
new AnnotationConfiguration(),
new WebXmlConfiguration(),
new WebInfConfiguration()
});
server.setHandler(webAppContext);
(this Stackoverflow thread inspired me a lot here)
Now it’s time for the last part of the post: parametrizing our integration tests. Since we want to test validation constraints, there are many edge paths to check (and make your code coverage close to 100%). Writing one test per each case could be a bad idea. Among the many solutions for JUnit I’m most convinced to the Junit Params by Pragmatists team. It’s really simple and have nice concept of JQuery-like helper for creating providers. Here is my tests code (I’m also using builder pattern here to create various kinds of Todos):
@Test
@Parameters(method = "provideInvalidTodosForCreation")
public void shouldRejectInvalidTodoWhenCreate(Todo todo) {
Response response = createTarget().request().post(Entity.json(todo));
assertThat(response.getStatus()).isEqualTo(BAD_REQUEST.getStatusCode());
}
private static Object[] provideInvalidTodosForCreation() {
return $(
new TodoBuilder().withDescription("test").build(),
new TodoBuilder().withDueDate(DateTime.now()).build(),
new TodoBuilder().withId(123L).build(),
new TodoBuilder().build()
);
}
OK, enough of reading, feel free to clone the project and start writing your REST services!
Atom Feeds with Spring MVC
- byJakub Nabrdalik
- January 12, 2012
How about Spring MVC?
Here are my assumptions:
- you are using Spring framework
- you have some entity, say “News”, that you want to publish in your feeds
- your "News" entity has creationDate, title, and shortDescription
- you have some repository/dao, say "NewsRepository", that will return the news from your database
- you want to write as little as possible
- you don't want to format Atom (xml) by hand
Step 1: add Spring MVC dependency to your application
With maven that will be:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-webmvc</artifactId>
<version>3.1.0.RELEASE</version>
</dependency>
Step 2: add Spring MVC DispatcherServlet
With web.xml that would be:
<servlet>
<servlet-name>dispatcher</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet</servlet-class>
<init-param>
<param-name>contextConfigLocation</param-name>
<param-value>classpath:spring-mvc.xml</param-value>
</init-param>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>dispatcher</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/feed</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
Notice, I set the url-pattern to “/feed” which means I don't want Spring MVC to handle any other urls in my app (I'm using a different web framework for the rest of the app). I also give it a brand new contextConfigLocation, where only the mvc configuration is kept.Remember that, when you add a DispatcherServlet to an app that already has Spring (from ContextLoaderListener for example), your context is inherited from the global one, so you should not create beans that exist there again, or include xml that defines them. Watch out for Spring context getting up twice, and refer to spring or servlet documentation to understand what's happaning.
Step 3. add ROME – a library to handle Atom format
With maven that is:
<dependency>
<groupId>net.java.dev.rome</groupId>
<artifactId>rome</artifactId>
<version>1.0.0</version>
</dependency>
Step 4. write your very simple controller
@Controller
public class FeedController {
static final String LAST_UPDATE_VIEW_KEY = "lastUpdate";
static final String NEWS_VIEW_KEY = "news";
private NewsRepository newsRepository;
private String viewName;
protected FeedController() {} //required by cglib
public FeedController(NewsRepository newsRepository, String viewName) {
notNull(newsRepository); hasText(viewName);
this.newsRepository = newsRepository;
this.viewName = viewName;
}
@RequestMapping(value = "/feed", method = RequestMethod.GET)
@Transactional
public ModelAndView feed() {
ModelAndView modelAndView = new ModelAndView();
modelAndView.setViewName(viewName);
List<News> news = newsRepository.fetchPublished();
modelAndView.addObject(NEWS_VIEW_KEY, news);
modelAndView.addObject(LAST_UPDATE_VIEW_KEY, getCreationDateOfTheLast(news));
return modelAndView;
}
private Date getCreationDateOfTheLast(List<News> news) {
if(news.size() > 0) {
return news.get(0).getCreationDate();
}
return new Date(0);
}
}
And here's a test for it, in case you want to copy&paste (who doesn't?):@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class FeedControllerShould {
@Mock private NewsRepository newsRepository;
private Date FORMER_ENTRY_CREATION_DATE = new Date(1);
private Date LATTER_ENTRY_CREATION_DATE = new Date(2);
private ArrayList<News> newsList;
private FeedController feedController;
@Before
public void prepareNewsList() {
News news1 = new News().title("title1").creationDate(FORMER_ENTRY_CREATION_DATE);
News news2 = new News().title("title2").creationDate(LATTER_ENTRY_CREATION_DATE);
newsList = newArrayList(news2, news1);
}
@Before
public void prepareFeedController() {
feedController = new FeedController(newsRepository, "viewName");
}
@Test
public void returnViewWithNews() {
//given
given(newsRepository.fetchPublished()).willReturn(newsList);
//when
ModelAndView modelAndView = feedController.feed();
//then
assertThat(modelAndView.getModel())
.includes(entry(FeedController.NEWS_VIEW_KEY, newsList));
}
@Test
public void returnViewWithLastUpdateTime() {
//given
given(newsRepository.fetchPublished()).willReturn(newsList);
//when
ModelAndView modelAndView = feedController.feed();
//then
assertThat(modelAndView.getModel())
.includes(entry(FeedController.LAST_UPDATE_VIEW_KEY, LATTER_ENTRY_CREATION_DATE));
}
@Test
public void returnTheBeginningOfTimeAsLastUpdateInViewWhenListIsEmpty() {
//given
given(newsRepository.fetchPublished()).willReturn(new ArrayList<News>());
//when
ModelAndView modelAndView = feedController.feed();
//then
assertThat(modelAndView.getModel())
.includes(entry(FeedController.LAST_UPDATE_VIEW_KEY, new Date(0)));
}
}
Notice: here, I'm using fest-assert and mockito. The dependencies are: <dependency> <groupId>org.easytesting</groupId> <artifactId>fest-assert</artifactId> <version>1.4</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.mockito</groupId> <artifactId>mockito-all</artifactId> <version>1.8.5</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency>
Step 5. write your very simple view
Here's where all the magic formatting happens. Be sure to take a look at all the methods of Entry class, as there is quite a lot you may want to use/fill.
import org.springframework.web.servlet.view.feed.AbstractAtomFeedView;
[...]
public class AtomFeedView extends AbstractAtomFeedView {
private String feedId = "tag:yourFantastiSiteName";
private String title = "yourFantastiSiteName: news";
private String newsAbsoluteUrl = "http://yourfanstasticsiteUrl.com/news/";
@Override
protected void buildFeedMetadata(Map<String, Object> model, Feed feed, HttpServletRequest request) {
feed.setId(feedId);
feed.setTitle(title);
setUpdatedIfNeeded(model, feed);
}
private void setUpdatedIfNeeded(Map<String, Object> model, Feed feed) {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Date lastUpdate = (Date)model.get(FeedController.LAST_UPDATE_VIEW_KEY);
if (feed.getUpdated() == null || lastUpdate != null || lastUpdate.compareTo(feed.getUpdated()) > 0) {
feed.setUpdated(lastUpdate);
}
}
@Override
protected List<Entry> buildFeedEntries(Map<String, Object> model, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws Exception {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
List<News> newsList = (List<News>)model.get(FeedController.NEWS_VIEW_KEY);
List<Entry> entries = new ArrayList<Entry>();
for (News news : newsList) {
addEntry(entries, news);
}
return entries;
}
private void addEntry(List<Entry> entries, News news) {
Entry entry = new Entry();
entry.setId(feedId + ", " + news.getId());
entry.setTitle(news.getTitle());
entry.setUpdated(news.getCreationDate());
entry = setSummary(news, entry);
entry = setLink(news, entry);
entries.add(entry);
}
private Entry setSummary(News news, Entry entry) {
Content summary = new Content();
summary.setValue(news.getShortDescription());
entry.setSummary(summary);
return entry;
}
private Entry setLink(News news, Entry entry) {
Link link = new Link();
link.setType("text/html");
link.setHref(newsAbsoluteUrl + news.getId()); //because I have a different controller to show news at http://yourfanstasticsiteUrl.com/news/ID
entry.setAlternateLinks(newArrayList(link));
return entry;
}
}
Step 6. add your classes to your Spring context
I'm using xml approach. because I'm old and I love xml. No, seriously, I use xml because I may want to declare FeedController a few times with different views (RSS 1.0, RSS 2.0, etc.).
So this is the forementioned spring-mvc.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd">
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.ContentNegotiatingViewResolver">
<property name="mediaTypes">
<map>
<entry key="atom" value="application/atom+xml"/>
<entry key="html" value="text/html"/>
</map>
</property>
<property name="viewResolvers">
<list>
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.BeanNameViewResolver"/>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
<bean class="eu.margiel.pages.confitura.feed.FeedController">
<constructor-arg index="0" ref="newsRepository"/>
<constructor-arg index="1" value="atomFeedView"/>
</bean>
<bean id="atomFeedView" class="eu.margiel.pages.confitura.feed.AtomFeedView"/>
</beans>
And you are done.
I've been asked a few times before to put all the working code in some public repo, so this time it's the other way around. I've describe things that I had already published, and you can grab the commit from the bitbucket.
Hope that helps.
Deploying multiple apps with different versions using a single Ansible command
- byPiotr Fus
- September 16, 2022