DDevelopment & Design

Manipulate XML Documents in C++ with xmlbeansxx

Using XML processing typically simplifies a developer’s job–but not when you’re programming in c++. Ever wish someone would create the C++ equivalent of XMLBeans? Someone has. Find out how this new open-source tool fills a serious gap in the C++ software environment.

Read the article at Devx.com

Next article —

RTP/RTCP - Realtime Transport/Control Protocol

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

Clojure web development – state of the art

It’s now more than a year that I’m getting familiar with Clojure and the more I dive into it, the more it becomes the language. Once you defeat the “parentheses fear”, everything else just makes the difference: tooling, community, good engineering practices. So it’s now time for me to convince others. In this post I’ll try to walktrough a simple web application from scratch to show key tools and libraries used to develop with Clojure in late 2015.

Note for Clojurians: This material is rather elementary and may be useful for you if you already know Clojure a bit but never did anything bigger than hello world application.

Note for Java developers: This material shows how to replace Spring, Angular, grunt, live-reload with a bunch of Clojure tools and libraries and a bit of code.

The repo with final code and individual steps is here.

Bootstrap

I think all agreed that component is the industry standard for managing lifecycle of Clojure applications. If you are a Java developer you may think of it as a Spring (DI) replacement - you declare dependencies between “components” which are resolved on “system” startup. So you just say “my component needs a repository/database pool” and component library “injects” it for you.

To keep things simple I like to start with duct web app template. It’s a nice starter component application following the 12-factor philosophy. So let’s start with it:

lein new duct clojure-web-app +example

The +example parameter tells duct to create an example endpoint with HTTP routes - this would be helpful. To finish bootstraping run lein setup inside clojure-web-app directory.

Ok, let’s dive into the code. Component and injection related code should be in system.clj file:

(defn new-system [config]
  (let [config (meta-merge base-config config)]
    (-> (component/system-map
         :app  (handler-component (:app config))
         :http (jetty-server (:http config))
         :example (endpoint-component example-endpoint))
        (component/system-using
         {:http [:app]
          :app  [:example]
          :example []}))))

In the first section you instantiate components without dependencies, which are resolved in the second section. So in this example, “http” component (server) requires “app” (application abstraction), which in turn is injected with “example” (actual routes). If your component needs others, you just can get then by names (precisely: by Clojure keywords).

To start the system you must fire a REPL - interactive environment running within context of your application:

lein repl

After seeing prompt type (go). Application should start, you can visit http://localhost:3000 to see some example page.

A huge benefit of using component approach is that you get fully reloadable application. When you change literally anything - configuration, endpoints, implementation, you can just type (reset) in REPL and your application is up-to-date with the code. It’s a feature of the language, no JRebel, Spring-reloaded needed.

Adding REST endpoint

Ok, in the next step let’s add some basic REST endpoint returning JSON. We need to add 2 dependencies in project.clj file:

:dependencies
 ...
  [ring/ring-json "0.3.1"]
  [cheshire "5.1.1"]

Ring-json adds support for JSON for your routes (in ring it’s called middleware) and cheshire is Clojure JSON parser (like Jackson in Java). Modifying project dependencies if one of the few tasks that require restarting the REPL, so hit CTRL-C and type lein repl again.

To configure JSON middleware we have to add wrap-json-body and wrap-json-response just before wrap-defaults in system.clj:

(:require 
 ...
 [ring.middleware.json :refer [wrap-json-body wrap-json-response]])

(def base-config
   {:app {:middleware [[wrap-not-found :not-found]
                      [wrap-json-body {:keywords? true}]
                      [wrap-json-response]
                      [wrap-defaults :defaults]]

And finally, in endpoint/example.clj we must add some route with JSON response:

(:require 
 ...
 [ring.util.response :refer [response]]))

(defn example-endpoint [config]
  (routes
    (GET "/hello" [] (response {:hello "world"}))
    ...

Reload app with (reset) in REPL and test new route with curl:

curl -v http://localhost:3000/hello

< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
< Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:17:37 GMT
< Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
< Set-Cookie: ring-session=37c337fb-6bbc-4e65-a060-1997718d03e0;Path=/;HttpOnly
< X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
< X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
< X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
< Content-Length: 151
* Server Jetty(9.2.10.v20150310) is not blacklisted
< Server: Jetty(9.2.10.v20150310)
<
* Connection #0 to host localhost left intact
{"hello": "world"}

It works! In case of any problems you can find working version in this commit.

Adding frontend with figwheel

Coding backend in Clojure is great, but what about the frontend? As you may already know, Clojure could be compiled not only to JVM bytecode, but also to Javascript. This may sound familiar if you used e.g. Coffescript. But ClojureScript philosophy is not only to provide some syntax sugar, but improve your development cycle with great tooling and fully interactive development. Let’s see how to achieve it.

The best way to introduce ClojureScript to a project is figweel. First let’s add fighweel plugin and configuration to project.clj:

:plugins
   ...
   [lein-figwheel "0.3.9"]

And cljsbuild configuration:

:cljsbuild
    {:builds [{:id "dev"
               :source-paths ["src-cljs"]
               :figwheel true
               :compiler {:main       "clojure-web-app.core"
                          :asset-path "js/out"
                          :output-to  "resources/public/js/clojure-web-app.js"
                          :output-dir "resources/public/js/out"}}]}

In short this tells ClojureScript compiler to take sources from src-cljs with figweel support and but resulting JavaScript into resources/public/js/clojure-web-app.js file. So we need to include this file in a simple HTML page:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
  <div id="main">
  </div>
  <script src="js/clojure-web-app.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
</body>
</html>

To serve this static file we need to change some defaults and add corresponding route. In system.clj change api-defaults to site-defaults both in require section and base-config function. In example.clj add following route:

(GET "/" [] (io/resource "public/index.html")

Again (reset) in REPL window should reload everything.

But where is our ClojureScript source file? Let’s create file core.cljs in src-cljs/clojure-web-app directory:

(ns ^:figwheel-always clojure-web-app.core)

(enable-console-print!)

(println "hello from clojurescript")

Open another terminal and run lein fighweel. It should compile ClojureScript and print ‘Prompt will show when figwheel connects to your application’. Open http://localhost:3000. Fighweel window should prompt:

To quit, type: :cljs/quit
cljs.user=>

Type (js/alert "hello"). Boom! If everything worked you should see and alert in your browser. Open developers console in your browser. You should see hello from clojurescript printed on the console. Change it in core.cljs to (println "fighweel rocks") and save the file. Without reloading the page your should see updated message. Figweel rocks! Again, in case of any problems, refer to this commit.

In the next post I’ll show how to fetch data from MongoDB, serve it with REST to the broser and write ReactJs/Om components to render it. Stay tuned!

DDevelopment & Design

Spock basics

Spock (homepage) is like its authors say 'testing and specification framework'. Spock combines very elegant and natural syntax with the powerful capabilities. And what is most important it is easy to use.

One note at the very beginning: I assume that you are already familiar with principles of Test Driven Development and you know how to use testing framework like for example JUnit.

So how can I start?


Writing spock specifications is very easy. We need basic configuration of Spock and Groovy dependencies (if you are using mavenized project with Eclipse look to my previous post: Spock, Java and Maven). Once we have everything set up and running smooth we can write our first specs (spec or specification is equivalent for test class in other frameworks like JUnit of TestNG).

What is great with Spock is fact that we can use it to test both Groovy projects and pure Java projects or even mixed projects.


Let's go!


Every spec class must inherit from spock.lang.Specification class. Only then test runner will recognize it as test class and start tests. We will write few specs for this simple class: User class and few tests not connected with this particular class.

We start with defining our class:
import spock.lang.*

class UserSpec extends Specification {

}
Now we can proceed to defining test fixtures and test methods.

All activites we want to perform before each test method, are to be put in def setup() {...} method and everything we want to be run after each test should be put in def cleanup() {...} method (they are equivalents for JUnit methods with @Before and @After annotations).

It can look like this:
class UserSpec extends Specification {
    User user
    Document document

    def setup() {
        user = new User()
        document = DocumentTestFactory.createDocumentWithTitle("doc1")
    }

    def cleanup() {

    }
}
Of course we can use field initialization for instantiating test objects:
class UserSpec extends Specification {
    User user = new User()
    Document document = DocumentTestFactory.createDocumentWithTitle("doc1")

    def setup() {

    }

    def cleanup() {

    }
}

What is more readable or preferred? It is just a matter of taste because according to Spock docs behaviour is the same in these two cases.

It is worth mentioning that JUnit @BeforeClass/@AfterClass are also present in Spock as def setupSpec() {...} and def cleanupSpec() {...}. They will be runned before first test and after last test method.


First tests


In Spock every method in specification class, expect setup/cleanup, is treated by runner as a test method (unless you annotate it with @Ignore).

Very interesting feature of Spock and Groovy is ability to name methods with full sentences just like regular strings:
class UserSpec extends Specification {
    // ...

    def "should assign coment to user"() {
        // ...
    }
}
With such naming convention we can write real specification and include details about specified behaviour in method name, what is very convenient when reading test reports and analyzing errors.

Test method (also called feature method) is logically divided into few blocks, each with its own purpose. Blocks are defined like labels in Java (but they are transformed with Groovy AST transform features) and some of them must be put in code in specific order.

Most basic and common schema for Spock test is:
class UserSpec extends Specification {
    // ...

    def "should assign coment to user"() {
        given:
            // do initialization of test objects
        when:
            // perform actions to be tested
        then:
            // collect and analyze results
    }
}

But there are more blocks like:
  • setup
  • expect
  • where
  • cleanup
In next section I am going to describe each block shortly with little examples.

given block

This block is used to setup test objects and their state. It has to be first block in test and cannot be repeated. Below is little example how can it be used:
class UserSpec extends Specification {
    // ...

    def "should add project to user and mark user as project's owner"() {
        given:
            User user = new User()
            Project project = ProjectTestFactory.createProjectWithName("simple project")
        // ...
    }
}

In this code given block contains initialization of test objects and nothing more. We create simple user without any specified attributes and project with given name. In case when some of these objects could be reused in more feature methods, it could be worth putting initialization in setup method.

when and then blocks

When block contains action we want to test (Spock documentation calls it 'stimulus'). This block always occurs in pair with then block, where we are verifying response for satisfying certain conditions. Assume we have this simple test case:
class UserSpec extends Specification {
    // ...

    def "should assign user to comment when adding comment to user"() {
        given:
            User user = new User()
            Comment comment = new Comment()
        when:
            user.addComment(comment)
        then:
            comment.getUserWhoCreatedComment().equals(user)
    }

    // ...
}

In when block there is a call of tested method and nothing more. After we are sure our action was performed, we can check for desired conditions in then block.

Then block is very well structured and its every line is treated by Spock as boolean statement. That means, Spock expects that we write instructions containing comparisons and expressions returning true or false, so we can create then block with such statements:
user.getName() == "John"
user.getAge() == 40
!user.isEnabled()
Each of lines will be treated as single assertion and will be evaluated by Spock.

Sometimes we expect that our method throws an exception under given circumstances. We can write test for it with use of thrown method:
class CommentSpec extends Specification {
    def "should throw exception when adding null document to comment"() {
        given:
            Comment comment = new Comment()
        when:
            comment.setCommentedDocument(null)
        then:
            thrown(RuntimeException)
    }
}

In this test we want to make sure that passing incorrect parameters is correctly handled by tested method and that method throws an exception in response. In case you want to be certain that method does not throw particular exception, simply use notThrown method.


expect block

Expect block is primarily used when we do not want to separate when and then blocks because it is unnatural. It is especially useful for simple test (and according to TDD rules all test should be simple and short) with only one condition to check, like in this example (it is simple but should show the idea):
def "should create user with given name"() {
    given:
        User user = UserTestFactory.createUser("john doe")
    expect:
        user.getName() == "john doe"
}



More blocks!


That were very simple tests with standard Spock test layout and canonical divide into given/when/then parts. But Spock offers more possibilities in writing tests and provides more blocks.


setup/cleanup blocks

These two blocks have the very same functionality as the def setup and def cleanup methods in specification. They allow to perform some actions before test and after test. But unlike these methods (which are shared between all tests) blocks work only in methods they are defined in. 


where - easy way to create readable parameterized tests

Very often when we create unit tests there is a need to "feed" them with sample data to test various cases and border values. With Spock this task is very easy and straighforward. To provide test data to feature method, we need to use where block. Let's take a look at little the piece of code:

def "should successfully validate emails with valid syntax"() {
    expect:
        emailValidator.validate(email) == true
    where:
        email }

In this example, Spock creates variable called email which is used when calling method being tested. Internally feature method is called once, but framework iterates over given values and calls expect/when block as many times as there are values (however, if we use @Unroll annotation Spock can create separate run for each of given values, more about it in one of next examples).

Now, lets assume that we want our feature method to test both successful and failure validations. To achieve that goal we can create few parameterized variables for both input parameter and expected result. Here is a little example:

def "should perform validation of email addresses"() {
    expect:
        emailValidator.validate(email) == result
    where:
        email         result }
Well, it looks nice, but Spock can do much better. It offers tabular format of defining parameters for test what is much more readable and natural. Lets take a look:
def "should perform validation of email addresses"() {
    expect:
        emailValidator.validate(email) == result
    where:
        email           | result
        "WTF"           | false
        "@domain"       | false
        "foo@bar.com"   | true
        "a@test"        | false
}
In this code, each column of our "table" is treated as a separate variable and rows are values for subsequent test iterations.

Another useful feature of Spock during parameterizing test is its ability to "unroll" each parameterized test. Feature method from previous example could be defined as (the body stays the same, so I do not repeat it):
@Unroll("should validate email #email")
def "should perform validation of email addresses"() {
    // ...
}
With that annotation, Spock generate few methods each with its own name and run them separately. We can use symbols from where blocks in @Unroll argument by preceding it with '#' sign what is a signal to Spock to use it in generated method name.


What next?


Well, that was just quick and short journey  through Spock and its capabilities. However, with that basic tutorial you are ready to write many unit tests. In one of my future posts I am going to describe more features of Spock focusing especially on its mocking abilities.