DDevelopment & Design

Writing JAXB in Groovy

Suppose you want write a jaxb class in groovy. Why? Because you do not have to write these all getters, setters and other methods. You only have to write your fields down.@XmlRootElement@HashCodeAndEquals@ToStringclass Person { String firstName String …

Suppose you want write a jaxb class in groovy. Why? Because you do not have to write these all getters, setters and other methods. You only have to write your fields down.

@XmlRootElement 
@HashCodeAndEquals 
@ToString 
class Person {
    String firstName String lastName Integer age
}

 

Lets check if we could unmarshal xml to Person class:

def 'should unmarshall person xml to object'(){
    given:
        JAXBContext jc = JAXBContext.newInstance(Person)
        String xml = 'JohnSmith20' 
    expect:
        jc.createUnmarshaller().unmarshal(new StringReader(xml)) == new Person(firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Smith', age: 20)
}

 

When we try this, then we obtain an eception:

com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.IllegalAnnotationsException: 1 counts of IllegalAnnotationExceptions
groovy.lang.MetaClass is an interface, and JAXB can't handle interfaces.
 this problem is related to the following location:
  at groovy.lang.MetaClass
  at public groovy.lang.MetaClass com.blogspot.przybyszd.jaxbingroovy.Person.getMetaClass()
  at com.blogspot.przybyszd.jaxbingroovy.Person

 at com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.IllegalAnnotationsException$Builder.check(IllegalAnnotationsException.java:91)
 at com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.JAXBContextImpl.getTypeInfoSet(JAXBContextImpl.java:445)
 at com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.JAXBContextImpl.(JAXBContextImpl.java:277)
 at com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.JAXBContextImpl.(JAXBContextImpl.java:124)
 at com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.JAXBContextImpl$JAXBContextBuilder.build(JAXBContextImpl.java:1123)
 at com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.ContextFactory.createContext(ContextFactory.java:147)
 at javax.xml.bind.ContextFinder.newInstance(ContextFinder.java:247)
 at javax.xml.bind.ContextFinder.newInstance(ContextFinder.java:234)
 at javax.xml.bind.ContextFinder.find(ContextFinder.java:462)
 at javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext.newInstance(JAXBContext.java:641)
 at javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext.newInstance(JAXBContext.java:584)
 at com.blogspot.przybyszd.jaxbingroovy.PersonJaxbTest.should unmarshall person xml to object(PersonJaxbTest.groovy:10)

It is because groovy defines getMetaClass method for us. Marshaller and Unmarshaller use by default

XmlAccessType.PUBLIC_MEMBER what means that public getters and setters should be used during marshalling/unmarshalling. To solve this just add XmlAccessorType annotatnio with XmlAccessType.FIELD on jaxb class:

@XmlRootElement @EqualsAndHashCode @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) class Person {
    String firstName String lastName Integer age
}

 

Of course if you want to apply this rule for each jaxb class in package, then you could put XmlAccessorType in pacakge-info.java file.

@XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) package com.blogspot.przybyszd.jaxbingroovy;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAccessType;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAccessorType;

 

Great, it works. Now let’s check out marshaller:

def 'should marshall person'() {
    given:
        JAXBContext jc = JAXBContext.newInstance(Person)
        Person p = new Person(firstName: 'John', lastName: 'Smith', age: 20)
        StringWriter sw = new StringWriter()
    when:
        jc.createMarshaller().marshal(p, sw)
    then:
        String xml = sw.toString()
        GPathResult gPathResult = new XmlSlurper().parseText(xml)
        gPathResult.name() == 'person'
        gPathResult.firstName == 'John'
        gPathResult.lastName == 'Smith'
        gPathResult.age == '20'
}

 

And it also works. Source is available here.

— Previous article

Restart or power off Rasperry PI with REST call

Next article —

Groovy, Callable and ExecutorService

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

Private fields and methods are not private in groovy

I used to code in Java before I met groovy. Like most of you, groovy attracted me with many enhancements. This was to my surprise to discover that method visibility in groovy is handled different than Java!

Consider this example:

class Person {
private String name
public  String surname

private Person() {}

private String signature() { "${name?.substring(0, 1)}. $surname" }

public String toString() { "I am $name $surname" }
}

How is this class interpreted with Java?

  1. Person has private constructor that cannot be accessed
  2. Field "name" is private and cannot be accessed
  3. Method signature() is private and cannot be accessed

Let's see how groovy interpretes Person:

public static void main(String[] args) {
def person = new Person()   // constructor is private - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

    person.@name = 'Mike'       // access name field directly - compilation error in Java
println(person.toString())

    person.name = 'John'        // there is a setter generated by groovy
println(person.toString())

    person.@surname = 'Foo'     // access surname field directly
println(person.toString())

    person.surname = 'Bar'      // access auto-generated setter
println(person.toString())

println(person.signature()) // call private method - compilation error in Java
}

I was really astonished by its output:

I am null null
I am Mike null
I am John null
I am John Foo
I am John Bar
J. Bar

As you can see, groovy does not follow visibility directives at all! It treats them as non-existing. Code compiles and executes fine. It's contrary to Java. In Java this code has several errors, pointed out in comments.

I've searched a bit on this topic and it seems that this behaviour is known since version 1.1 and there is a bug report on that: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GROOVY-1875. It is not resolved even with groovy 2 release. As Tim Yates mentioned in this Stackoverflow question: "It's not clear if it is a bug or by design". Groovy treats visibility keywords as a hint for a programmer.

I need to keep that lesson in mind next time I want to make some field or method private!

DDevelopment & Design

Loops performance in Groovy

IntroductionIn the 2018 Advent of Code challenged I solved all the puzzles in Groovy. It is pretty obvious, that choosing good data structure is the most important to obtain performant solution. However, the way we iterate over those structures is also...
DDevelopment & Design

Turing completeness II

Well, as I wrote in the previous post, sed is a Turing complete language. We can use it to implement some simple algorithms, or even a dc interpreter. But what does it really mean? How complex tasks may we achieve using plain sed?What about writin...Well, as I wrote in the previous post, sed is a Turing complete language. We can use it to implement some simple algorithms, or even a dc interpreter. But what does it really mean? How complex tasks may we achieve using plain sed?What about writin...