DDevelopment & Design

EhCache config with BeanUtils

BeanUtils allows you to set Bean properties.If you have configuration stored in a Map it’s tempting to use BeanUtils to automagically setup EhCache configuration.Sadly this class has mixed types in setters and getter and thus BeanUtils that use Introsp…

BeanUtils allows you to set Bean properties.
If you have configuration stored in a Map it’s tempting to use BeanUtils to automagically setup EhCache configuration.
Sadly this class has mixed types in setters and getter and thus BeanUtils that use Introspector behind won’t get getter and setter pairs properly. It will get only getters and thus inform you that these properties are read only: “Skipping read-only property”.

My fast solution is to use BeanUtils and have a fallback to Reflection.

public static void setProperty(Object obj, String propertyName, Object propertyValue, boolean silently) {
        try {
            PropertyDescriptor desc = PropertyUtils.getPropertyDescriptor(obj, propertyName);
            Method writeMethod = desc.getWriteMethod(); 
                 
            if (writeMethod == null) {
                writeMethod = getAlternativeWriteMethod(obj, propertyName, propertyValue.getClass());
            }
            
            if (writeMethod == null) {
                if (silently) {
                    return;
                }
                throw new IllegalArgumentException("Can't find writerMethod for " + propertyName);
            }

            if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
                LOG.trace(String.format("Setting %s property of %s", propertyName, obj.getClass().getSimpleName()));
            }
            
            writeMethod.invoke(obj, propertyValue);
        } catch (IllegalAccessException | NoSuchMethodException | InvocationTargetException e) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Error when setting object property.", e);
        }
    }

    private static Method getAlternativeWriteMethod(Object obj, String propertyName, Class paramClass) throws NoSuchMethodException {
        String setterMethod = "set" + propertyName.substring(0, 1).toUpperCase() + propertyName.substring(1);
        Method m; 
        if ((m = getMethod(obj, paramClass, setterMethod)) != null) {
            return m;
        }
        Class altClass = paramClass.isPrimitive() ? ClassUtils.primitiveToWrapper(paramClass) : ClassUtils.wrapperToPrimitive(paramClass);
        if ((m = getMethod(obj, altClass, setterMethod)) != null) {
            return m;
        }
        
        return null;
    }

    private static Method getMethod(Object obj, Class paramClass, String setterMethod) {

        try {
            return obj.getClass().getMethod(setterMethod, paramClass);
        } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
            return null;
        }
    }

I will think about PR to Configuration class but it’s complicated as EhCache 2.x is not present on GitHub.

— Previous article

All you need is docker (and fig)

Next article —

Abstract method in Enums

You May Also Like
DDevelopment & Design

Spock, Java and Maven

Few months ago I've came across Groovy - powerful language for JVM platform which combines the power of Java with abilities typical for scripting languages (dynamic typing, metaprogramming).

Together with Groovy I've discovered spock framework (https://code.google.com/p/spock/) - specification framework for Groovy (of course you can test Java classes too!). But spock is not only test/specification framework - it also contains powerful mocking tools.

Even though spock is dedicated for Groovy there is no problem with using it for Java classes tests. In this post I'm going to describe how to configure Maven project to build and run spock specifications together with traditional JUnit tests.


Firstly, we need to prepare pom.xml and add necessary dependencies and plugins.

Two obligatory libraries are:
<dependency>
    <groupid>org.spockframework</groupId>
    <artifactid>spock-core</artifactId>
    <version>0.7-groovy-2.0</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
    <groupid>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId>
    <artifactid>groovy-all</artifactId>
    <version>${groovy.version}</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
Where groovy.version is property defined in pom.xml for more convenient use and easy version change, just like this: 
<properties>
    <gmaven-plugin.version>1.4</gmaven-plugin.version>
    <groovy.version>2.1.5</groovy.version>
</properties>

I've added property for gmaven-plugin version for the same reason ;)

Besides these two dependencies, we can use few additional ones providing extra functionality:
  • cglib - for class mocking
  • objenesis - enables mocking classes without default constructor
To add them to the project put these lines in <dependencies> section of pom.xml:
<dependency>
    <groupid>cglib</groupId>
    <artifactid>cglib-nodep</artifactId>
    <version>3.0</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
    <groupid>org.objenesis</groupId>
    <artifactid>objenesis</artifactId>
    <version>1.3</version>
    <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>

And that's all for dependencies section. Now we will focus on plugins necessary to compile Groovy classes. We need to add gmaven-plugin with gmaven-runtime-2.0 dependency in plugins section:
<plugin>
    <groupid>org.codehaus.gmaven</groupId>
    <artifactid>gmaven-plugin</artifactId>
    <version>${gmaven-plugin.version}</version>
    <configuration>
        <providerselection>2.0</providerSelection>
    </configuration>
    <executions>
        <execution>
            <goals>
                <goal>compile</goal>
                <goal>testCompile</goal>
            </goals>
        </execution>
    </executions>
    <dependencies>
        <dependency>
            <groupid>org.codehaus.gmaven.runtime</groupId>
            <artifactid>gmaven-runtime-2.0</artifactId>
            <version>${gmaven-plugin.version}</version>
            <exclusions>
                <exclusion>
                    <groupid>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId>
                    <artifactid>groovy-all</artifactId>
                </exclusion>
            </exclusions>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupid>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId>
            <artifactid>groovy-all</artifactId>
            <version>${groovy.version}</version>
        </dependency>
    </dependencies>
</plugin>

With these configuration we can use spock and write our first specifications. But there is one issue: default settings for maven-surefire plugin demand that test classes must end with "..Test" postfix, which is ok when we want to use such naming scheme for our spock tests. But if we want to name them like CommentSpec.groovy or whatever with "..Spec" ending (what in my opinion is much more readable) we need to make little change in surefire plugin configuration:
<plugin>
    <groupid>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
    <artifactid>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
    <version>2.15</version>
    <configuration>
        <includes>
            <include>**/*Test.java</include>
            <include>**/*Spec.java</include>
        </includes>
    </configuration>
</plugin>

As you can see there is a little trick ;) We add include directive for standard Java JUnit test ending with "..Test" postfix, but there is also an entry for spock test ending with "..Spec". And there is a trick: we must write "**/*Spec.java", not "**/*Spec.groovy", otherwise Maven will not run spock tests (which is strange and I've spent some time to figure out why Maven can't run my specs).

Little update: instead of "*.java" postfix for both types of tests we can write "*.class" what is in my opinion more readable and clean:
<include>**/*Test.class</include>
<include>**/*Spec.class</include>
(thanks to Tomek Pęksa for pointing this out!)

With such configuration, we can write either traditional JUnit test and put them in src/test/java directory or groovy spock specifications and place them in src/test/groovy. And both will work together just fine :) In one of my next posts I'll write something about using spock and its mocking abilities in practice, so stay in tune.

DDevelopment & Design

Turing completeness II

Well, as I wrote in the previous post, sed is a Turing complete language. We can use it to implement some simple algorithms, or even a dc interpreter. But what does it really mean? How complex tasks may we achieve using plain sed?What about writin...Well, as I wrote in the previous post, sed is a Turing complete language. We can use it to implement some simple algorithms, or even a dc interpreter. But what does it really mean? How complex tasks may we achieve using plain sed?What about writin...