Our effort to build WS Human Task implementation was donated to The Apache Software Foundation. Proposal can be seen here. Apache HISE Project page contains up to date information.
You May Also Like
New Firefox 14 ruined all my GWT work (Ubuntu 12.04)
- byBartek Zdanowski
- July 19, 2012
That's because there's no GWT Development Mode plugin for Firefox 14. And now I can't work!Wait! There's a solution. Instead of fighting with ubuntu with reversing installed Firefox to 13. I can have parallel versions of FF.So how to install previous v...
Insert into .. select… na oraclu gubi dane.
- byradek
- January 28, 2011
Problem dotyczy serwra w wersji Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 – 64bi i pobrania danych z…
JBoss Envers and Spring transaction managers
- byJakub Nabrdalik
- September 20, 2011
I've stumbled upon a bug with my configuration for JBoss Envers today, despite having integration tests all over the application. I have to admit, it casted a dark shadow of doubt about the value of all the tests for a moment. I've been practicing TDD since 2005, and frankly speaking, I should have been smarter than that.
My fault was simple. I've started using Envers the right way, with exploratory tests and a prototype. Then I've deleted the prototype and created some integration tests using in-memory H2 that looked more or less like this example:
Because Envers inserts audit data when the transaction is commited (in a new temporary session), I thought I have to create and commit the transaction manually. And that is true to some point.
My fault was that I didn't have an end-to-end integration/acceptance test, that would call to entry point of the application (in this case a service which is called by GWT via RPC), because then I'd notice, that the Spring @Transactional annotation, and calling transaction.commit() are two, very different things.
Spring @Transactional annotation will use a transaction manager configured for the application. Envers on the other hand is used by subscribing a listener to hibernate's SessionFactory like this:
Envers creates and collects something called AuditWorkUnits whenever you update/delete/insert audited entities, but audit tables are not populated until something calls AuditProcess.beforeCompletion, which makes sense. If you are using org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction manually, this is called on commit() when notifying all subscribed javax.transaction.Synchronization objects (and enver's AuditProcess is one of them).
The problem was, that I used a wrong transaction manager.
This transaction manager doesn't know anything about hibernate and doesn't use org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction. While Synchronization is an interface from javax.transaction package, DataSourceTransactionManager doesn't use it (maybe because of simplicity, I didn't dig deep enough in org.springframework.jdbc.datasource), and thus Envers works fine except not pushing the data to the database.
Which is the whole point of using Envers.
Use right tools for the task, they say. The whole problem is solved by using a transaction manager that is well aware of hibernate underneath.
Lesson learned: always make sure your acceptance tests are testing the right thing. If there is a doubt about the value of your tests, you just don't have enough of them,
My fault was simple. I've started using Envers the right way, with exploratory tests and a prototype. Then I've deleted the prototype and created some integration tests using in-memory H2 that looked more or less like this example:
@Test
public void savingAndUpdatingPersonShouldCreateTwoHistoricalVersions() {
//given
Person person = createAndSavePerson();
String oldFirstName = person.getFirstName();
String newFirstName = oldFirstName + "NEW";
//when
updatePersonWithNewName(person, newFirstName);
//then
verifyTwoHistoricalVersionsWereSaved(oldFirstName, newFirstName);
}
private Person createAndSavePerson() {
Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
Person person = PersonFactory.createPerson();
session.save(person);
transaction.commit();
return person;
}
private void updatePersonWithNewName(Person person, String newName) {
Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
person.setFirstName(newName);
session.update(person);
transaction.commit();
}
private void verifyTwoHistoricalVersionsWereSaved(String oldFirstName, String newFirstName) {
List<Object[]> personRevisions = getPersonRevisions();
assertEquals(2, personRevisions.size());
assertEquals(oldFirstName, ((Person)personRevisions.get(0)[0]).getFirstName());
assertEquals(newFirstName, ((Person)personRevisions.get(1)[0]).getFirstName());
}
private List<Object[]> getPersonRevisions() {
Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
AuditReader auditReader = AuditReaderFactory.get(session);
List<Object[]> personRevisions = auditReader.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity(Person.class, false, true)
.getResultList();
transaction.commit();
return personRevisions;
}
Because Envers inserts audit data when the transaction is commited (in a new temporary session), I thought I have to create and commit the transaction manually. And that is true to some point.
My fault was that I didn't have an end-to-end integration/acceptance test, that would call to entry point of the application (in this case a service which is called by GWT via RPC), because then I'd notice, that the Spring @Transactional annotation, and calling transaction.commit() are two, very different things.
Spring @Transactional annotation will use a transaction manager configured for the application. Envers on the other hand is used by subscribing a listener to hibernate's SessionFactory like this:
<bean id="sessionFactory" class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.annotation.AnnotationSessionFactoryBean" >
...
<property name="eventListeners">
<map key-type="java.lang.String" value-type="org.hibernate.event.EventListeners">
<entry key="post-insert" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
<entry key="post-update" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
<entry key="post-delete" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
<entry key="pre-collection-update" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
<entry key="pre-collection-remove" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
<entry key="post-collection-recreate" value-ref="auditEventListener"/>
</map>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="auditEventListener" class="org.hibernate.envers.event.AuditEventListener" />
Envers creates and collects something called AuditWorkUnits whenever you update/delete/insert audited entities, but audit tables are not populated until something calls AuditProcess.beforeCompletion, which makes sense. If you are using org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction manually, this is called on commit() when notifying all subscribed javax.transaction.Synchronization objects (and enver's AuditProcess is one of them).
The problem was, that I used a wrong transaction manager.
<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager" >
<property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
</bean>
This transaction manager doesn't know anything about hibernate and doesn't use org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction. While Synchronization is an interface from javax.transaction package, DataSourceTransactionManager doesn't use it (maybe because of simplicity, I didn't dig deep enough in org.springframework.jdbc.datasource), and thus Envers works fine except not pushing the data to the database.
Which is the whole point of using Envers.
Use right tools for the task, they say. The whole problem is solved by using a transaction manager that is well aware of hibernate underneath.
<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager" >
<property name="sessionFactory" ref="sessionFactory"/>
</bean>
Lesson learned: always make sure your acceptance tests are testing the right thing. If there is a doubt about the value of your tests, you just don't have enough of them,