Getting rid of null parameters with a simple spring aspect

What is the most hated and at the same time the most popular exception in the world? I bet it’s the NullPointerException.

NullPointerException can mean anything, from simple “ups, I didn’t think that can be null” to hours and days of debugging of third-party libraries (try using Dozer for complicated transformations, I dare you).

The funny thing is, it’s trivial to get rid of all the NullPointerExceptions in your code. This triviality is a side effect of a technique called “Design by Contract”.

I won’t go into much details about the theory, you can find everything you need on Wikipedia, but in the nutshell Design by Contract means:

  • each method has a precondition (what it expects before being called)
  • each method has a postcondition (what it guarantees, what is returned)
  • each class has an constraint on its state (class invariant)

So at the beginning of each method you check whether preconditions are met, at the end, whether postconditions and invariant are met, and if something’s wrong you throw an exception saying what is wrong.

Using Spring’s internal static methods that throw appropriate exceptions

(IllegalArgumentException), it can look something like this:

import static org.springframework.util.Assert.notNull;
import static org.springframework.util.StringUtils.hasText;

public class BranchCreator {
    public Story createNewBranch(Story story, User user, String title) {
        verifyParameters(story, user, title);
        Story branch = //... the body of the class returnig an object
        verifyRetunedValue(branch);
        return branch;
    }

    private void verifyParameters(Story story, User user, String title) {
        notNull(story);
        notNull(user);
        hasText(title);
    }

    private void verifyRetunedValue(Story branch) {
        notNull(branch);
    }
}

You can also use Validate class from apache commons instead of spring’s notNull/hasText.

Usually I just check preconditions and write tests for postconditions and constraints. But still, this is all boiler plate code. To move it out of your class, you can use many Design by Contract libraries, for example SpringContracts, or Contract4J. Either way you end up checking the preconditions on every public method.

And guess what? Except for Data Transfer Objects and some setters, every public method I write expects its parameters NOT to be null.

So to save us some writing of this boiler plate ocde, how about adding a simple aspect that will make it impossible in the whole application, to pass null to anything other than DTOs and setters? Without any additional libraries (I assume you are already using Spring Framework), annotations, and what else.

Why would I like to not allow for nulls in parameters? Because we have method overloading in modern languages. Seriously, how often do you want to see something like this:

Address address = AddressFactory.create(null, null, null, null);

And this is not much better either

Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Workbook theWorkbook = ExcelObj.Workbooks.Open(openFileDialog.FileName, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing, Type.Missing);

The solution

So here is a simple solution: you add one class to your project and a few lines of spring IoC configuration.

The class (aspect) looks like this:

import org.aspectj.lang.JoinPoint;
import static org.springframework.util.Assert.notNull;

public class NotNullParametersAspect {
    public void throwExceptionIfParametersAreNull(JoinPoint joinPoint) {
        for(Object argument : joinPoint.getArgs()) {
            notNull(argument);
        }
    }
}

And the spring configuration is here (remember to change the namespace to your project).

The “&&” is no error, it’s just && condition escaped in xml. If you do not understand aspectj pointcut definition syntaxt, here is a little cheat sheet.

And here is a test telling us that the configuration is succesfull.

public class NotNullParametersAspectIntegrationTest extends AbstractIntegrationTest {
    @Resource(name = "userFeedbackFacade")
    private UserFeedbackFacade userFeedbackFacade;

    @Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
    public void shouldThrowExceptionIfParametersAreNull() {
        //when
        userFeedbackFacade.sendFeedback(null);

        //then exception is thrown
    }

    @Test
    public void shouldNotThrowExceptionForNullParametersOnDto() {
        //when
        UserBookmarkDto userBookmarkDto = new UserBookmarkDto();
        userBookmarkDto.withChapter(null);
        StoryAncestorDto ancestorDto = new StoryAncestorDto(null, null, null, null);

        //then no exception is thrown
    }
}

AbstractIntegrationTest is a simple class that starts the spring test context. You can use AbstractTransactionalJUnit4SpringContextTests with @ContextConfiguration(..) instead.

The catch

Ah yes, there is a catch. Since spring AOP uses either J2SE dynamic proxies basing on an interface or aspectj CGLIB proxies, every class will either need an interface (for simple proxy based aspect weaving) or a constructor without any parameters (for cglib weaving). The good news is that the constructor can be private.

You May Also Like

Thought static method can’t be easy to mock, stub nor track? Wrong!

No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from SpecificationThe global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)No matter why, no matter is it a good idea. Sometimes one just wants to check or it's necessary to be done. Mock a static method, woot? Impossibru!

In pure Java world it is still a struggle. But Groovy allows you to do that really simple. Well, not groovy alone, but with a great support of Spock.

Lets move on straight to the example. To catch some context we have an abstract for the example needs. A marketing project with a set of offers. One to many.

import spock.lang.Specification

class OfferFacadeSpec extends Specification {

    OfferFacade facade = new OfferFacade()

    def setup() {
        GroovyMock(Project, global: true)
    }

    def 'delegates an add offer call to the domain with proper params'() {
        given:
            Map params = [projId: projectId, name: offerName]

        when:
            Offer returnedOffer = facade.add(params)

        then:
            1 * Project.addOffer(projectId, _) >> { projId, offer -> offer }
            returnedOffer.name == params.name

        where:
            projectId | offerName
            1         | 'an Offer'
            15        | 'whasup!?'
            123       | 'doskonała oferta - kup teraz!'
    }
}
So we test a facade responsible for handling "add offer to the project" call triggered  somewhere in a GUI.
We want to ensure that static method Project.addOffer(long, Offer) will receive correct params when java.util.Map with user form input comes to the facade.add(params).
This is unit test, so how Project.addOffer() works is out of scope. Thus we want to stub it.

The most important is a GroovyMock(Project, global: true) statement.
What it does is modifing Project class to behave like a Spock's mock. 
GroovyMock() itself is a method inherited from SpecificationThe global flag is necessary to enable mocking static methods.
However when one comes to the need of mocking static method, author of Spock Framework advice to consider redesigning of implementation. It's not a bad advice, I must say.

Another important thing are assertions at then: block. First one checks an interaction, if the Project.addOffer() method was called exactly once, with a 1st argument equal to the projectId and some other param (we don't have an object instance yet to assert anything about it).
Right shit operator leads us to the stub which replaces original method implementation by such statement.
As a good stub it does nothing. The original method definition has return type Offer. The stub needs to do the same. So an offer passed as the 2nd argument is just returned.
Thanks to this we can assert about name property if it's equal with the value from params. If no return was designed the name could be checked inside the stub Closure, prefixed with an assert keyword.

Worth of  mentioning is that if you want to track interactions of original static method implementation without replacing it, then you should try using GroovySpy instead of GroovyMock.

Unfortunately static methods declared at Java object can't be treated in such ways. Though regular mocks and whole goodness of Spock can be used to test pure Java code, which is awesome anyway :)